2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3084834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Slice Lifecycle Management for 5G Mobile Networks: An Intent-Based Networking Approach

Abstract: Network slicing in 5G is a solution to accommodate a wide range of services. It also enables the network operators to establish multiple end-to-end (e2e) logically isolated and customized networks with shared or dedicated resources over the same infrastructure. Although, many tools and platforms have been developed to accomplish the management and orchestration (MANO) of e2e network slicing automatically, it is still challenging. Each of these platforms requires expertise and manual effort to define the requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have focused on the demonstration of intent based platforms operating over 5G research infrastructures. For example, [18] and [19] introduce intent based platform prototypes aiming at simplifying the lifecycle management of 5G network slices. The authors in [18] use a 5G stack based on Open Source MANO (OSM) [20] and FlexRAN [21], while in [19] the authors use a stack based on M-CORD [22].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have focused on the demonstration of intent based platforms operating over 5G research infrastructures. For example, [18] and [19] introduce intent based platform prototypes aiming at simplifying the lifecycle management of 5G network slices. The authors in [18] use a 5G stack based on Open Source MANO (OSM) [20] and FlexRAN [21], while in [19] the authors use a stack based on M-CORD [22].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of existing solutions in the Literature for intent to network configuration focus on the direct mapping of intents into policies [11], [32]. However, one of the main limitations of this approach is that the rigid modeling of policies as events-condition-actions fails to capture intent goals except in the context of predefined services such as network slicing [40]. A different approach is used in [34] where intents are translated directly into optimization problems for resource assignment and allocation.…”
Section: B Related Approaches For Intent Modeling and Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By deploying the MEC, the smart devices can move their computationally demanding tasks to the nearest powerful edge servers, conserving energy and lowering latency. Moreover, network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) enhanced the MEC capabilities by enabling the deployment of virtual network functions (VNF) on edge [4][5][6], for example, pilot and control functions of UAVs. Recent research on MEC has focused on mobile edge servers rather than fixed servers because they can offer cost-effective, highly flexible, and efficient computation services in a challenging environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%