2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3753080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Structure Analysis Identifying Key Genes of Autism and Its Mechanism

Abstract: Identifying the key genes of autism is of great significance for understanding its pathogenesis and improving the clinical level of medicine. In this paper, we use the structural parameters (average degree) of gene correlation networks to identify genes related to autism and study its pathogenesis. Based on the gene expression profiles of 82 autistic patients (the experimental group, E) and 64 healthy persons (the control group, C) in NCBI database, spearman correlation networks are established, and their aver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNA samples were isolated from subjects’ CD146+ cells and processed by Affymetrix human U133 Plus 2.0 array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), from which two groups of Discovery and Validation were formed [ 36 ]: The Discovery group consisted of a dataset of 22 healthy subjects (control group) and 21 acute myocardial infarction patients (AMI group), and the Validation group consisted of a dataset of 28 healthy subjects and 28 AMI patients. In [ 36 ], Discovery was taken as the research object and 126 differential expression genes (DEGs) were screened out according to the hypothesis test of gene expression profiles [ 37 ] ( p < 0.0001). This paper still uses these 126 DEGs as the research object and does not carry out any processing of excluded data.…”
Section: Case and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA samples were isolated from subjects’ CD146+ cells and processed by Affymetrix human U133 Plus 2.0 array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), from which two groups of Discovery and Validation were formed [ 36 ]: The Discovery group consisted of a dataset of 22 healthy subjects (control group) and 21 acute myocardial infarction patients (AMI group), and the Validation group consisted of a dataset of 28 healthy subjects and 28 AMI patients. In [ 36 ], Discovery was taken as the research object and 126 differential expression genes (DEGs) were screened out according to the hypothesis test of gene expression profiles [ 37 ] ( p < 0.0001). This paper still uses these 126 DEGs as the research object and does not carry out any processing of excluded data.…”
Section: Case and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the shared genetic networks, our enrichment analysis also signaled some processes that differentiate the three clusters, and that could possibly cause phenotypic dissimilarities. Actually, the analysis brought to light the presence of cluster-specific processes, which were not shared with the other clusters; for example, in the case of the biological process “kidney development” in Cluster A, or “cardiac septum development” in Cluster C. Although this observation should be considered with caution, as the relative FDR p -values, though statistically significant, are close to the threshold of <0.005, it is noteworthy that recently ASD-related processes regarding the heart and kidney have become features of scientific and clinical interest [ 63 , 64 ]. Both cluster-specific and common atypical biological processes might interact to shape the specific phenotype of each individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a considerable genetic heterogeneity underlying ASD, there is compelling evidence that a large number of risk genes can be integrated into a much smaller number of proteinprotein interaction (PPI) networks [26]. Previous studies have shown that ASD genes functionally converge in synapse development, axon alignment, neuron motility, synaptic transmission, chromatin remodeling, transcription and translation regulation, ion transport, and cell adhesion [27][28][29][30][31][32]. As far as we know, these studies were mainly focused on investigating genes affected in children with ASD, but not in relatives with subclinical phenotypes of BAP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%