2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network structure and N-dependence in agent-based herding models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
102
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that fixing the other parameters we find the pairwise (L = 2) case to show similar behavior as the general L case (we have only studied L < 20). A similar conclusion was found using different distributions of a k , which seems to indicate a robustness of contagion effects on those two parameters somewhat similar to what was reported in [11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that fixing the other parameters we find the pairwise (L = 2) case to show similar behavior as the general L case (we have only studied L < 20). A similar conclusion was found using different distributions of a k , which seems to indicate a robustness of contagion effects on those two parameters somewhat similar to what was reported in [11].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A different view of interaction between market participants was presented in an "ant recruitment" model of herding/epidemics in [10]. In similar vein models of social opinion dynamics and agent based models of investor sentiments was presented in [11][12][13][14][15][16]. It should be noted however that only the work of [12,14] keep the price and sentiments as two distinguished variables which we find important since sentiment (as well as price) can be obtained empirically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The formula was tested for relatively small networks of the types random, 2-D regular lattice, Barabasi-Albert scale-free and small world. Similar results were obtained in the context of herding behavior of economic agents [24,42]. The evolution equation for the macroscopic states can be obtained from equations (6) if we define r 1 (m, t) and r 0 (m, t) as the probabilities of having m peripheral nodes in state 1 at time t with the central node in state 1 and 0 respectively.…”
Section: Fully Connected Networksupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore it seems reasonable to assume that these directors, in spite of their small number relative to the overall network size, exert a disproportionate degree of influence in the network. The hierarchical nature of the director network is also important from the viewpoint of probabilistic herding models, such as the one studied by Alfarano and Milaković (2008), because the hierarchical structure of the network can generate system-wide conformity in agents' opinions irrespective of the size of the network, including the possibility that the social interaction of core agents leads to the propagation of "animal spirits" across an entire system that is several orders of magnitude larger than the size of the core.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mintz and Schwartz (1981) have argued that the degree of interest-group formation can be assessed by some core of board interlocks. Moreover, Alfarano and Milaković (2008) have argued theoretically that a network core is crucial for the propagation of opinion dynamics in a generic probabilistic herding model with a large number of agents, and several authors have suggested procedures to classify or identify a core of key players in complex networks (for a more recent take on the classic concept of coreperiphery structures in networks see, e.g., Borgatti, 2006;Borgatti and Everett, 1999;Holme, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%