Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017) 2017
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2017.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Structure and User Roles of a Crowdsourcing Community _ The Context of Social Innovations for a Development Project

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in the Innovation phase the purpose is developing coherent visions for change including prototypes, ideas for reorganizing the work in question, an overview of new qualifications if needed, and a plan for visions. Fuger et al (2017) presents an initiative using a crowdsourcing approach to SI and to improve conditions of low income communities, comprising four phases. The "research phase" has the aim of motivating all participants to share inspirations, stories, tools and successful examples on the challenge topic.…”
Section: Mq: How Are Si Projects Developed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, in the Innovation phase the purpose is developing coherent visions for change including prototypes, ideas for reorganizing the work in question, an overview of new qualifications if needed, and a plan for visions. Fuger et al (2017) presents an initiative using a crowdsourcing approach to SI and to improve conditions of low income communities, comprising four phases. The "research phase" has the aim of motivating all participants to share inspirations, stories, tools and successful examples on the challenge topic.…”
Section: Mq: How Are Si Projects Developed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information related on what techniques and tools are used to maintain actors involved and how they relate and communicate along the project was also missing. Lack of incentives and support in municipal, state and local policies (DUFOUR et al, 2014), (TELLO-ROZAS, 2016), (QUANDT et al, 2017), (ROCLE & SALLES, 2017), 2 Processual Involvement of users in the design process (FERRARIO et al, 2014), (MARTI et al, 2016) Lack of engagement/commitment/involvement of actors (locals, sponsors, social entrepreneurs and other) (DUFOUR et al, 2014), (FERRARIO et al, 2014), (JUDIT et al, 2016), (FUGER et al, 2017), (NEMES, 2017), (STOKES et al, 2017) Lack of understanding and measurement of social innovation impact (STOKES et al, 2017) Lack of common vocabulary and understanding between all the actors involved (ALTUNA et al, 2015) Lack of clarity about the return on investment.…”
Section: Government Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation