2016
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1203970
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networked intimacy. Intimacy and friendship among Italian Facebook users

Abstract: In this paper, we describe the results of a qualitative study conducted with 120 Italian Facebook users to investigate how Facebook enables people to achieve a mutually constitutive intimacy with their own friendship network: a negotiation of intimacy in public through self-disclosure, where the affordances\ud of the platform are useful to elicit significant reactions, validations and demonstrations of affection from others. We observed that, in order to achieve various levels of intimacy on Facebook, people e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical research also attests that in some cases, users may or may not have an idea of the audience which they are addressing (Litt & Hargittai, 2016; Marwick & boyd, 2010). Users achieve different levels of privacy by engaging different strategies and creating “forms of collaborative disclosure , because they rely on others’ collaboration in managing the boundaries of privacy and publicness and reducing the risks of undesirable consequences (Petronio, 2002)” (Farci, Boccia Artieri, Giglietto, & Rossi, 2016, p. 11, italics original).…”
Section: Social Media Publicness and Privacy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research also attests that in some cases, users may or may not have an idea of the audience which they are addressing (Litt & Hargittai, 2016; Marwick & boyd, 2010). Users achieve different levels of privacy by engaging different strategies and creating “forms of collaborative disclosure , because they rely on others’ collaboration in managing the boundaries of privacy and publicness and reducing the risks of undesirable consequences (Petronio, 2002)” (Farci, Boccia Artieri, Giglietto, & Rossi, 2016, p. 11, italics original).…”
Section: Social Media Publicness and Privacy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farci, Rossi, Boccia Artieri, and Giglietto (2016) demonstrate, based on a qualitative study involving 120 Italian Facebook users, that social media has given rise to a new form of intimacy, which is performed and managed through implicit yet strategic collaborations between the discloser of information and the intended audience. One of the tactics that Marwick and boyd (2014) have identified being used among American teenagers to safeguard their “privacy in networked publics” is steganography, that is, hiding private or sensitive information within what appears to be an ordinary message.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Saying Without Sayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pols’ (2012) work on ‘care at a distance’ in relation to devices used for telehealth notes that the common conceptualisation of communication using technologies as ‘cold’ and face-to-face interactions as ‘warm’ neglects the nuances of people’s experiences. Other studies have demonstrated how close relationships can be established or supported by digitally mediated interaction on social media platforms (Farci et al, 2017; Madianou and Miller, 2012) and locative media (Hjorth et al, 2018). In terms of family relationships, several researchers have shown that family members separated by long distances have found benefits in using digital media such as Skype and messaging apps (Longhurst, 2016; Madianou, 2016) for enacting transnational and intergenerational ‘ambient co-presence’ (Madianou, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%