Optical Fiber Telecommunications VII 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816502-7.00018-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking and routing in space-division multiplexed systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The switch that supports randomly-coupled MCFs would typically be composed of a waveguide shuffle that rearranges the core configuration at the entrance of the switch, followed by a wavelength selective switch in "joint switching" configuration, where a single steering element (microelectromechanical system (MEMS) or liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) mirror) is used to switch all cores at the same time. At the output of the switch, a second core shuffle would be used to match the core arrangement of the randomly-coupled MCFs [107]. The disadvantage of this architecture is that randomly-coupled MCFs are not compatible with SMFs terrestrial networks, and there is no simple path to scale the number of cores over time.…”
Section: B Terrestrial Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The switch that supports randomly-coupled MCFs would typically be composed of a waveguide shuffle that rearranges the core configuration at the entrance of the switch, followed by a wavelength selective switch in "joint switching" configuration, where a single steering element (microelectromechanical system (MEMS) or liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) mirror) is used to switch all cores at the same time. At the output of the switch, a second core shuffle would be used to match the core arrangement of the randomly-coupled MCFs [107]. The disadvantage of this architecture is that randomly-coupled MCFs are not compatible with SMFs terrestrial networks, and there is no simple path to scale the number of cores over time.…”
Section: B Terrestrial Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(c)], as performed today in today's SMF networks at the wavelength channel level. The tradeoffs between independent switching of each wavelength and core communication channel at the expense of hardware complexity versus switching at the wavelength channel level across all spatial channels (known as wavelength superchannel) or at the spatial channel level across all wavelengths (spatial superchannel) have been addressed in [42] and [43] and remains an active area of debate for future network builds.…”
Section: Optical Switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offering an optically switched environment at the scale required for datacenters (many thousands over complete fiber bandwidth), i.e., the flat topology of Fig. 14(c), can be addressed via an optical switch fabric consisting of multiple OXC placed in a Benes network [43] [Fig. 15 (top)].…”
Section: Proceedings Of the Ieee 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a network, an optical link supports multiple optical channels and each channel uses a specific wavelength [1][2][3]. The optical nodes may connect any channel on one of its input ports to any channel on one of its output ports [4][5]. In an optical network, an optical path is defined by a succession of links and nodes between a source node and a destination node in which a single wavelength is used from end to end [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%