Networking Controller Based Real Time Traffic Prediction in Clustered Vehicular Adhoc Networks

Balaji, T. S.; Srinivasan, S.

doi:10.32604/iasc.2023.028785

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides, there exist many other nominate solutions for TSD such as applying the Single Shot Detection algorithm in the VGG-16 model [10], analyzing semantically on objects [11], building a structure of detection, refinement and classification [12], deploying a single CNN architecture [13], combining a detector and semantics segmentation to address traffic signs [14], applying models of You only look once (YOLO) [15,16] or YOLO4 [17] and improved Mask R-CNN model. The traffic signs detection can also be researched in other ways using deep learning [18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Deep Learning Model of Traffic Signs in Panoramic Images Detection

Huynh¹,

Le²,

Arif³

et al. 2023

Intelligent Automation &Amp; Soft Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To pursue the ideal of a safe high-tech society in a time when traffic accidents are frequent, the traffic signs detection system has become one of the necessary topics in recent years and in the future. The ultimate goal of this research is to identify and classify the types of traffic signs in a panoramic image. To accomplish this goal, the paper proposes a new model for traffic sign detection based on the Convolutional Neural Network for comprehensive traffic sign classification and Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Networks (R-CNN) implementation for identifying and extracting signs in panoramic images. Data augmentation and normalization of the images are also applied to assist in classifying better even if old traffic signs are degraded, and considerably minimize the rates of discovering the extra boxes. The proposed model is tested on both the testing dataset and the actual images and gets 94.5% of the correct signs recognition rate, the classification rate of those signs discovered was 99.41% and the rate of false signs was only around 0.11.

show abstract