2015
DOI: 10.21307/joss-2019-020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks and Religion: Ties that Bind, Loose, Build Up, and Tear Down

Abstract: That social networks play a central role in religious life is well accepted by most social scientists. We are reasonably confident, for instance, that they are crucial for the recruitment and retention of members, the diffusion of religious ideas and practices, motivating individuals to volunteer and become politically active, the health and well-being of people of faith, and conflict, radicalization, and (sometimes) violence. However, in conference presentations, journal articles, and books social network ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Religious assistance is shown both empirically and theoretically to increase political aid 39 and civic commitment. 40,41 However, the motives behind such commitment could be due to rent-seeking, which increases political corruption. In addition, there are other economic motivations for those who are religious: religion can add to an individual's moral character, as a principal value in transaction of the marketplace.…”
Section: Religiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religious assistance is shown both empirically and theoretically to increase political aid 39 and civic commitment. 40,41 However, the motives behind such commitment could be due to rent-seeking, which increases political corruption. In addition, there are other economic motivations for those who are religious: religion can add to an individual's moral character, as a principal value in transaction of the marketplace.…”
Section: Religiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two concerns regarding the variable are worth discussing. The first relates to the variable not capturing network density or how well the friends themselves know each other (Everton 2018). This means that I cannot examine whether the effects of bonding on interfaith attitudes are constrained to dense religious networks or are more generalizable across levels of network density.…”
Section: Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a handful of studies that have explored the interplay between social networks and religious belief and practice have drawn on relatively robust network data, most use counts of ties as their network measure (Everton, , ). Although this is because such data are often all that is available (Cheadle and Schwadel ), they fail to capture the social context in which religious beliefs and practices are embedded.…”
Section: Epidemics Network and The Rise Of Christianitymentioning
confidence: 99%