2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3159674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks in Education: A Travelogue Through Five Decades

Abstract: For over five decades, researchers have used network analysis to understand educational contexts, spanning diverse disciplines and thematic areas. The wealth of traditions and insights accumulated through these interdisciplinary efforts is a challenge to synthesize with a traditional systematic review. To overcome this difficulty in reviewing 1791 articles researching the intersection of networks and education, this study combined a scientometric approach with a more qualitative analysis of metadata, such as k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(165 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis has shown that the process of knowledge production about COVID-19 was less skewed compared to educational research in general [12,93], with a large global participation of 137 different countries in research productivity. Whereas, research was concentrated in large and resourceful countries such as United States [35,57,67,68], China [77], India [49], Germany [33], United Kingdom [51]; we also see several studies that addressed local and nonwestern contexts, e.g., Philippines [61], Rural South Africa [65], Jordan [63], Romania [56], Indonesia [66].…”
Section: Reflections and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis has shown that the process of knowledge production about COVID-19 was less skewed compared to educational research in general [12,93], with a large global participation of 137 different countries in research productivity. Whereas, research was concentrated in large and resourceful countries such as United States [35,57,67,68], China [77], India [49], Germany [33], United Kingdom [51]; we also see several studies that addressed local and nonwestern contexts, e.g., Philippines [61], Rural South Africa [65], Jordan [63], Romania [56], Indonesia [66].…”
Section: Reflections and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not possible in this work because the dataset released by [41] came at an aggregate level. With the availability of finer datasets about BFMNs, it would be interesting to explore insights that individual-level mindset streams could bring over learning analytics [33], e.g. are students with more positive mindset streams also better at learning STEM subjects?…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars (Bragg et al, 2021;Lantz-Andersson et al, 2018;Lee, 2018) have used principles of Community of Practice by Lave and Wenger (1991) to explore how educators build, develop, maintain and re-create relations and connections with colleagues. According to a recent review by Saqr et al (2022) of fifty years of research of social networks in education there is an increasing body of research specifically using social network approaches to conceptualise, map, and analyse how these relations between educators develop.…”
Section: The Importance Of Social Network In (Online) Professional De...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the survey instrument used a so-called closednetwork analysis Rienties & Kinchin, 2014;Saqr et al, 2022) to measure the social networks within the OPD consisting of three social network questions (i.e., "I am friends with …", "I have learned from …", "I have worked with …"), whereby lists with names of the 19 participants were provided. We adopted the exact same approach as described in Rienties and Kinchin (2014) in order to be able to benchmark this to a PGCAP with similar participants following it in a f2f format.…”
Section: Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%