Networks in Marketing 1996
DOI: 10.4135/9781483327723.n6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks in Socioeconomic Systems: A Critical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
79
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the earliest approaches to relationship marketing research was social exchange theory, which placed importance on interactive marketing activities (Anderson and Narus, 1984;Araujo and Easton, 1996;Sheth and Parvatiyar, 1995). Other approaches have been grounded in inter-organisation theory (Van de Ven, 1992) and industrial network theory (Mattson, 1985).…”
Section: Relationship Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest approaches to relationship marketing research was social exchange theory, which placed importance on interactive marketing activities (Anderson and Narus, 1984;Araujo and Easton, 1996;Sheth and Parvatiyar, 1995). Other approaches have been grounded in inter-organisation theory (Van de Ven, 1992) and industrial network theory (Mattson, 1985).…”
Section: Relationship Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On books see, for instance, Dubois (1998), Ford (2002Ford ( , 1990, Ford et al (1998), Forsgren & Johanson (1992), Hakansson (1993, 2001), Gemunden, Ritter, and Walter (1997), Hakansson (1989Hakansson ( , 1987Hakansson ( , 1975, Hakansson, Harrison, and Waluszewski (2004), Hakansson and Johanson (2001), Hakansson and Waluszewski (2007), Hallen and Johanson (1989), Havila, Forsgren, and Hakansson (2002), Laage-Hellman (1997), Lundgren (1994), Moller and Wilson (1995), Naude and Turnbull (1998), Turnbull and Cunningham (1981), Turnbull and Paliwoda (1986), and Turnbull and Valla (1986). As illustrative examples of book chapters, check Araujo and Easton (1996), Easton (2000), Ford, McDowell, and Tomkins (1996), Hakansson (1993), Hakansson and Johanson (1988, 1993b, Hakansson and Snehota (2000), Johanson and Mattsson (1994), and Mattsson (1985Mattsson ( , 2004Mattsson ( , 1987.…”
Section: Imp1 and Imp2 Research Projects The Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several approaches to analysing relationships in terms of networks (see Araujo and Easton, 1996, for an overview), this article adopts the industrial network approach, underpinned by the interaction model, to understand different actors' behavior (Ford et al, 2003;. As such, business networks are used as a metaphor for constellations of direct and indirect business relationships (Anderson et al, 1994) and are defined in terms of how activities are linked together, how resources are utilised in relationships, and the strength of bonds between the relevant actors (Håkansson and Snehota, 1995).…”
Section: Business Network and Changementioning
confidence: 99%