Abstract-If β and γ are nonnegative integers and F is a field, then a polynomial collection {p1, . . . , p β } ⊆ Z[α1, . . . , αγ ] is said to be solvable over F if there exist ω1, . . . , ωγ ∈ F such that for all i = 1, . . . , β we have pi(ω1, . . . , ωγ ) = 0. We say that a network and a polynomial collection are solvably equivalent if for each field F the network has a scalar-linear solution over F if and only if the polynomial collection is solvable over F . Koetter and Médard's work implies that for any directed acyclic network, there exists a solvably equivalent polynomial collection. We provide the converse result, namely that for any polynomial collection there exists a solvably equivalent directed acyclic network. (Hence, the problems of network scalar-linear solvability and polynomial collection solvability have the same complexity.) The construction of the network is modeled on a matroid construction using finite projective planes, due to MacLane in 1936.A set Ψ of prime numbers is a set of characteristics of a network if for every q ∈ Ψ, the network has a scalarlinear solution over some finite field with characteristic q and does not have a scalar-linear solution over any finite field whose characteristic lies outside of Ψ. We show that a collection of primes is a set of characteristics of some network if and only if the collection is finite or co-finite. Two networks N and N are ls-equivalent if for any finite field F , N is scalar-linearly solvable over F if and only if N is scalar-linearly solvable over F . We further show that every network is ls-equivalent to a multiple-unicast matroidal network.