Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks

Kim, Junki

doi:10.1080/12294659.2006.10805075

Cited by 47 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This however, is achieved at the expense of institutional flexibility and innovation (Lowndes and Skelcher, 1998). Because of this centralized and unified command of decision making structure, bureaucratic governance is also referred to as vertical or hierarchical governance form (Kim, 2006).…”

Section: Network Governance Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These different types of governance are often a result of socio-economic and political process under which various social actors interact to achieve their set goals (Kim, 2006) and the effectiveness of each of the different types of governance (Rhodes, 1997). The bureaucratic governance also known as the central-rule model posits that there is a central steering agent (CSA) amongst numerous actors and assumes that the CSA has all information about all problems, preferences and solutions to problems facing the network.…”

Section: Network Governance Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms

Turyahikayo¹,

Matsiko²,

Okiror³

et al. 2017

J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation platforms are increasingly being used as a means of operationalizing innovation systems thinking. Agricultural innovation platforms are intended to bring together a number of stakeholders to promote an identified agricultural innovation. This is done through exchange of knowledge and other valuable resources to solve common problems. However, given the relatively new nature of innovation platforms, there is still limited conceptual knowledge on the mechanism within the platforms that leads to the implementation of innovations by different stakeholders who often have conflicting interests. This conceptual paper intended to review and unearth the intermediate processes that influence the actor innovation behavior by using the network governance theory. The review shows that the generation and implementation of ideas in an innovation platform is a process that involves structural, relational and social mechanisms. This review provides a foundation for future empirical studies in innovation platforms and particularly how they influence actor innovation behavior.

show abstract

Section: Network Governance Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Network Governance Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms

Turyahikayo¹,

Matsiko²,

Okiror³

et al. 2017

J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These key themes are discussed in four separate chapters in the findings section of the paper. Key characteristics of comprehensive and formal networks were drawn from the research of Kapucu and Garayev (2016), Junki (2006), Berardo and Scholz (2010), Perry (2004), Rhodes (1997), and Jordan (1990) in the literature review section of this thesis. These characteristics are listed in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively.…”

Section: Data Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five primary characteristics were identified from theories of bureaucratic and networked governance as discussed by Pierre and Peters (2000), Rhodes (1997), Hammond (1986), Junki (2006, Considine and Lewis (2003), Kljin (2008), and Kapucu and Graryev (2016) in the review of literature portion of this thesis. These characteristics are listed in Table 3.…”

Section: Table 2 Characteristics Of Formal and Informal Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development of Emergency Management Networks A Case Study of the Province of Ontario

Deguefe¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Networks have been argued to be essential in the field of emergency management for the design of policies and delivery of programs. Networks have been theorized to be capable of becoming the dominant governance structure in sectors of society. However, how networks develop and why they are rising in prominence is a contested issue. Moreover, the increasing prominence of networks in governance has complex implications that have yet to be fully explored. This thesis uses process tracing to knit together the analysis of provincial emergency response plans, after action reports, and semi-structured interviews with twenty-three emergency management professionals in order to make inferences on the development of characteristics of emergency management networks and governance in the Province of Ontario between the years of 1991 and 2018. This thesis contributes to an understanding of how and why emergency management networks and governance in the province have developed during this time.ii

show abstract

“…Together, the state and non-state actors exercise governmental practices. Governance refers to an institutionalised process that organises and coordinates activities among economic, political and societal actors toward realising public values (Grindle 2007;Kim 2006). Actors interact in networks, and the state does not govern 'above' other societal actors but with them (Koppenjan and Klijn 2004).…”

Section: Governance and Governance Mechanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Balancing and counterbalancing : the Indonesian state addressing pressures to improve palm oil sector sustainability

Pramudya¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

vi AcknowledgmentThough I was the one to take all steps in preparing, conducting and finalizing my PhD research, I did not travel alone. Many other people travelled with me, contributing to the success of my learning process and making my tough journey also a pleasant one. They invested their time and energy, sharing their intelligence in my research endeavour. There are far too many people to thank, without whom this project would not have materialised.I am fortunate to have received several years of funding from an interdisciplinary research program called 'Towards Environmentally Sustainable and Equitable Palm Oil' funded by the Interdisciplinary Research and Education Fund (INREF) of Wageningen University. When I started considering PhD research, I could not imagine that I would finally embark on a sixyear journey of research and writing. I would say that in these six years, it has been a luxury to spend most of my time working as a researcher, while also struggling to secure a livelihood from short-time assignments.

show abstract

Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks

Cited by 47 publications

References 3 publications

Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms

Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms

The Development of Emergency Management Networks A Case Study of the Province of Ontario

Balancing and counterbalancing : the Indonesian state addressing pressures to improve palm oil sector sustainability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About