2020
DOI: 10.33265/polar.v39.3647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks of international co-authorship in journal articles about Antarctic research, 1998–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our local-scale analysis of MDV science raises questions about the limitations of bibliometric and SNA research while drawing attention to patterns that may be missed at a broader scale. For example, our results suggest that, from a historical point of view, the question asked by Jang et al (2020) about collaboration among Americans, New Zealanders and Italians might actually be better asked about collaboration among Americans, New Zealanders and Japanese. The Japanese geochemist Tetsuya Torii was the most published researcher in the cumulative MDV network (Supplementary Table S3), yet without the historical data, the contributions by Torii and others from the Japanese group would have been largely missed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our local-scale analysis of MDV science raises questions about the limitations of bibliometric and SNA research while drawing attention to patterns that may be missed at a broader scale. For example, our results suggest that, from a historical point of view, the question asked by Jang et al (2020) about collaboration among Americans, New Zealanders and Italians might actually be better asked about collaboration among Americans, New Zealanders and Japanese. The Japanese geochemist Tetsuya Torii was the most published researcher in the cumulative MDV network (Supplementary Table S3), yet without the historical data, the contributions by Torii and others from the Japanese group would have been largely missed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is, therefore, surprising that few studies of the collaboration dynamics among scientific disciplines working in the southern continent have been done. Rather, bibliometric studies of Antarctic science have primarily focused on international collaboration at the continental scale (Dastidar 2007;Dastidar & Ramachandran 2008;Aksnes & Hessen 2009;Ji et al 2014;Kim & Jung 2016;Jang et al 2020). Each of these studies covers a recent 20-30-year period, usually back to the 1990s, with the earliest date being 1980.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The percentage of international articles increased two-fold between 1993 to 2012. A bibliometric analysis on Antarctic research for 1998 to 2015 by Jang et al (2020) reported that the degree of centrality on the Earth and related environmental sciences were ranked for several countries including the United States America, Germany, France and the United Kingdom [ 32 ]. Studies on environmental science started to gain popularity during the emergence of global issues on climate change.…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pertierra et al (2017) consider scientific productivity in their study of field camps in the Byers Peninsula, but their primary focus was environmental impact [17]. In addition to journal rankings and citation metrics, scientific productivity is often measured by the number of research publications [20][21][22]. While there are many other factors influencing the productivity of specific camps (e.g., funding, personnel, remoteness), publication frequency provides a consistent metric that can be computed and compared across the full history of scientific activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%