Networks of value, commodities and regions: Reworking divisions of labour in macro-regional economies

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore a theoretical framework that can assist in under-standing the extent to which the increased integration of macro-regional economies (such as the European and North American) and the global economy is leading to divergence and/or convergence in the pattern of economic activity and the distribution of value-added and wealth. In particular, the paper focuses on the extent to which changing divisions of labour, the production, appropriation and allocation of value, and economic organization underpin these processes of convergence/divergence. We focus on developing an understanding of the changing divisions of labour across space in increasingly integrated macro-regional economies such as Europe and North America, and the (unequal) flows of value between places that underpin mosaics of territorial inequality. We argue that the production and flows of value associated with different forms of economic activities and commodity production and exchange in different localities provides a framework for understanding changing geographical divisions of labour. We also argue that a critical engagement with the range of work associated with analysing ‘commodity chains’ and ‘commodity networks’ provides a way into thinking about the (dis)organization of economic activity and value creation, appropriation and distribution. In particular, we argue that the focus on the commodity, while initially helpful, is misplaced because commodities embody and carry with them relations of value. Consequently, our attention should be focused on the organization of the production, appropriation and realization of value flows and the various forces that structure these processes, such as state governance, labour organization, corporate practices and so on, that are fundamental to understanding the (re)configuration of economic activity in macro-regional economies.

Global models of networked organization, the positional power of nations and economic development

“…Sturgeon, Van Biesebroeck and Gereffi, 2008). On the other hand, power operates on multiple levels in GPN discussions, including firms, states, interest groups and supra-national institutions (for example, Coe, Dicken and Hess, 2008b;Henderson et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2002). 3 While this conceptualizion of power is clearly relational insofar as it reflects the power of a leading firm vis-à-vis its supplier, it also breaks down a bit (for example, Gibbon and Ponte, 2005: Ch.…”

Doing Evolution in Economic Geography

“…One route in draws upon the GPE conception of the full spatial circuits of value and meaning in capitalism, comprising co-evolutionary processes in time and space of production, circulation, consumption and their regulation (Hudson 2005, Smith et al 2002. Understood as inter-related parts of a connected and dynamic spatial circuit, each 13 process provides a potential entry point to render visible a wider array of actors and their socio-spatial relations than hitherto, and to begin the process of understanding such parts and their inter-relations within the whole circuit.…”

Nationalising local sustainability: Lessons from the British wartime Utility furniture scheme

“…As Smith has argued, this is not a call to return to the nation-state-centric analyses of economic development prevalent in so much social science scholarship on development, but it is to argue for the consideration of the constitutive role of state action at various scales in the establishment and restructuring of production networks (2014, 2). Whilst Smith's (2014; see also Smith et al, 2002) intent is an illumination of macroregional contexts, his suggestions for readings of the state that are attentive to the "configuration of social forces underpinning state support for particular policy directions" (2014,10) are instructive for our analysis of Utility within a national spaceeconomy. The necessity of direct intervention-to the extent of reconfiguring the furniture commodity network itself-may have been prompted by an extreme case (i.e.…”