2015
DOI: 10.3386/w20931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks, Shocks, and Systemic Risk

Abstract: This chapter develops a unified framework for the study of how network interactions can function as a mechanism for propagation and amplification of microeconomic shocks. The framework nests various classes of games over networks, models of macroeconomic risk originating from microeconomic shocks, and models of financial interactions. Under the assumption that shocks are small, we provide a fairly complete characterization of the structure of equilibrium, clarifying the role of network interactions in translat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several studies analyzed the impacts of the 2008 grain crisis on trade, highlighting the importance of shock propagation within the foodtrade system for food security and vulnerability (e.g. Heady 2011, Acemoglu et al 2015). Nevertheless, few studies have analyzed this phenomenon for foodcommodity trade networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies analyzed the impacts of the 2008 grain crisis on trade, highlighting the importance of shock propagation within the foodtrade system for food security and vulnerability (e.g. Heady 2011, Acemoglu et al 2015). Nevertheless, few studies have analyzed this phenomenon for foodcommodity trade networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we distinguish the case of games with strategic complements and substitutes and show that the equilibrium outcome exhibits properties as in finite network games with complements and substitutes, see e.g. [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Notably in the case of complements, the strategy of each agent at equilibrium is proportional to its Bonacich centrality in the underlying graphon, as recently defined in [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a model of rumor spreading in opinion dynamics. Other applications of quadratic network games where our results could apply are production networks and systemic risk in financial networks as described in [2] or crime, education and urban dynamics as described in [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network aggregative games (NAGs) are games in which the cost function of each agent depends on its own strategy and on an aggregate of the strategies of its neighbours, as defined by an underlying interaction network. NAGs are used to model a vast range of applications spanning from sociology [1] and economics [2] to traffic [3] and energy markets [4], [5]. In many cases, the resulting models depend on a vector of parameters that might represent either some exogenous factor in the case of social applications (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%