Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz in der Bewährung

Eifert, M.; Landenberg-Roberg, Michael von; Theß, Sebastian; Wienfort, Nora

doi:10.5771/9783748909477

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the evaluation report raises the crucial issue of the difficulty of either courts or possible out-of-court mechanism to handle the high number of cases timely (Eifert et al 2020a, p 146 ff. ;2020b), which apparently remains the still unsurmountable challenge of online hate speech cases. These mechanisms are a field of extreme interest for the new places where an inter-legal approach may be applied.…”

Section: Some Eu Countries' Centrifugal Forcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tackling online hate speech from a European perspective: Potentials and challenges of inter-legality

Bello

2023

Oñati Socio-Legal Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contribution delves into some main implications of the current soft and hard legal framework related to the Internet governance for tackling online hate speech, from the perspective of legal and social actors based in the European Union. Given the dynamic constellation characterised by centripetal trends towards UN-fostered international governance, Council of Europe and EU soft and hard legal instruments, co-existing with centrifugal forces of national legislations, the article explores how inter-legality may contribute tackling online hate speech in today’s fast changing and complex legal scenario. Hence, due to the lack of a universally recognised definition of hate speech and a global regulation of online communication, inter-legality may be operationalised in still unexplored places – that is, not only by judges but by lawmakers, independent authorities on communication, and even platforms.

show abstract

Section: Some Eu Countries' Centrifugal Forcesmentioning

confidence: 99%