Neue Decapoden-Krebse aus dem ungarischen Tertiär

Revision of the genus Glyphithyreus Reuss, 1859 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthoidea) and recognition of a new genus

“…Glyphithyreus formosus Reuss, 1859 (type species) Glyphithyreus Reuss, 1859 G. bituberculatus Collins and Jakobsen, 2003 Titanocarcinus A. Milne Edwards, 1864 this paper G. sturgeoni Feldmann et al, 1998 Lobonotus A. Milne Edwards, 1864 this paper ?G. wichmanni Feldmann et al, 1995 Chirinocarcinus new genus this paper Plagiolophus ellipticus Bittner, 1875 Glyphithyreus due to synonymy (Via, 1959) P. wetherelli Bell, 1858(¼ G. affinis Reuss, 1859 Glyphithyreus due to synonymy (Via, 1959) P. sulcatus Beurlen, 1939 Glyphithyreus due to synonymy (Via, 1969) P. markgrafi Ló´renthey, 1907[1909 Stintonius Collins, 2002 this paper P. weaveri Rathbun, 1926Orbitoplax Tucker and Feldmann, 1990Schweitzer, 2000P. vancouverensis Woodward, 1896 Archaeopus Rathbun, 1908Glaessner, 1929P.…”

“…Because Glyphithyreus is known from the Paleocene of Pakistan (Collins and Morris, 1978), it is thus the earliest known occurrence of the family and subfamily. The Panopeinae Ortmann, 1893, was previously known to have a well established Eocene record (Casadío et al, in review (Beurlen, 1939), as Plagiolophus; G. wetherelli (Bell, 1858), as Plagiolophus (¼ G. affinis Reuss, 1859).…”

“…markgrafi Lő renthey, [1909; P. weaveri Rathbun, 1926; and P. wetherelli, the latter of which he considered to be synonymous with both G. affinis Reuss, 1859, and G. formosus Reuss, 1859. Glaessner (1929 Nagao, 1941, from the Cretaceous of Japan; P. sulcatus Beurlen, 1939, from the Oligocene of Hungary; and P. vitiensis Rathbun, 1945, from the Miocene of Fiji, were subsequently described. In his review of the Eocene decapods of the world, Via (1969) placed P. ellipticus, P. ezoensis, P. markgrafi, P. sulcatus, P. weaveri, and P. vitiensis within Glyphithyreus.…”

“…Consequently, we recognize only four species of Glyphithyreus (Table 1). Of these, the placement of G. sulcatus is somewhat tentative and is based upon our translation of Beurlen's (1939) original description in German and the very poorly reproduced illustration in our copy of the work. The description of G. sulcatus clearly indicates two transverse ridges on the branchial regions, separated by a very deep cavity, which is certainly characteristic of Glyphithyreus.…”

Echinoid and Crustacean Burrows and Their Diagenetic Significance in the Maastrichtian‐danian of Stevns Klint, Denmark

“…Isolated fossil chelae similar to Ctenocheles are found in several localities and may belong to homarids, but the absence of a preserved carapace and the smaller manus support the suggestion that they belong to Ctenocheles as indicated by Glaessner (1948). Such chelae are described as Ischnodactylus by Pelseneer (1886) from the Maastrichtian of the Netherlands and by Rathbun (1936) from the Danian (Midway) and Eocene (Jackson) of Alabama and Mississippi, further as Thaumastocheles by Beurlen (1939) from the Oligocene of Hungary, as Oncopareia by Mertin (1941) from the Upper Senonian of Braunschweig in Germany and as Ctenocheles by Glaessner (1948) from the Eocene of Victoria in Australia. Gripp (1964, P1.…”