1965
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Activity in Mechanoreceptive Cutaneous Afferents: Stimulus-Response Relations, Weber Functions, and Information Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
179
4

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
179
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As might be expected, responses of gustatory afferents increase as the concentration (intensity) of the tastant increases [62]. Furthermore, the difference in firing rates (measured in rats) evoked by two tastants that are just discriminable (i.e., are one 'just noticeable difference' apart, as measured in humans) is constant across the range of concentrations, as Werner and Mountcastle have found to be the case in tactile intensity discrimination [21]. Note, however, that sensation magnitude cannot be inferred from discriminability [63][64][65].…”
Section: Peripheral Code Of Perceived Intensity In Other Sensory Modamentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As might be expected, responses of gustatory afferents increase as the concentration (intensity) of the tastant increases [62]. Furthermore, the difference in firing rates (measured in rats) evoked by two tastants that are just discriminable (i.e., are one 'just noticeable difference' apart, as measured in humans) is constant across the range of concentrations, as Werner and Mountcastle have found to be the case in tactile intensity discrimination [21]. Note, however, that sensation magnitude cannot be inferred from discriminability [63][64][65].…”
Section: Peripheral Code Of Perceived Intensity In Other Sensory Modamentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Information can be carried in spike rate (Werner and Mountcastle, 1965;Tolhurst, 1989), spike timing , spike correlations across neurons Singer, 1992, 1996;De Charms and Merzenich, 1996;Gawne et al, 1996;Roelfsema et al, 1997), or a combination of these. Recently, a great deal of attention has been focused on correlated firing: that the probability of one cell spiking is related to whether other nearby cells fire (Mastronarde, 1983;Ts'o and Gilbert, 1988;Engel et al, 1990;Gawne and Richmond, 1993;Zohary et al, 1994;Kreiter and Singer, 1996;De Oliveira et al, 1997;Lebedev et al, 2000;Maldonado et al, 2000;Bair et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnitude is an inherent property of all stimuli, and its subjective perceptual estimation, when assayed psychophysically, conforms to a power function whereby a constant percentage increase in the stimulus magnitude produces a constant percentage increase in the sensed effect (1). Neurophysiological recordings have shown that increasing stimulus magnitude is transduced by peripheral sense organs following the power law then ''represented'' by a linear increase in response strength across sensory system levels feeding ''primary'' cortical areas (2)(3)(4). In the auditory system, the magnitude and modulation of the sound-pressure envelope provide information that is essential for the perception of the distance separating an animal or human from other sound sources and convey critical information for vocal communication (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%