2002
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Basis of Temporal Context Memory: A Functional MRI Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, activity in right DLPFC was significantly correlated with recency accuracy, and marginally correlated with recency RT. In general, our findings of greater right DLPFC activity during retrieval events versus ordering events are consistent with studies that have found greater right PFC during EM retrieval in general (Habib, Nyberg, & Tulving, 2003;Nyberg, Cabeza, & Tulving, 1996) and during temporal context retrieval specifically (Dobbins, Rice, Wagner, & Schacter, 2003;Konishi et al, 2002;Rajah & McIntosh, 2006;Suzuki et al, 2002). However, due to the relatively short delay (30 sec) between encoding and retrieval in the current study design, it may be argued that the retrieval tasks employed in this study reflected retrieval from WM and not from EM.…”
Section: Retrieval-related Activity In Right Dlpfcsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, activity in right DLPFC was significantly correlated with recency accuracy, and marginally correlated with recency RT. In general, our findings of greater right DLPFC activity during retrieval events versus ordering events are consistent with studies that have found greater right PFC during EM retrieval in general (Habib, Nyberg, & Tulving, 2003;Nyberg, Cabeza, & Tulving, 1996) and during temporal context retrieval specifically (Dobbins, Rice, Wagner, & Schacter, 2003;Konishi et al, 2002;Rajah & McIntosh, 2006;Suzuki et al, 2002). However, due to the relatively short delay (30 sec) between encoding and retrieval in the current study design, it may be argued that the retrieval tasks employed in this study reflected retrieval from WM and not from EM.…”
Section: Retrieval-related Activity In Right Dlpfcsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Neuroimaging studies have highlighted the role of various PFC regions during temporal context retrieval (Cabeza, Anderson, Houle, Mangels, & Nyberg, 2000;Dobbins, Rice, Wagner, & Schacter, 2003;Dudukovic & Wagner, 2007;Konishi et al, 2002;Suzuki et al, 2002). However, it remains unclear which of these PFC activations are related to mediating domain or task-specific cognitive control processes such as, recollection-based retrieval monitoring, familiarity-based retrieval monitoring, retrieval success and establishing retrieval mode (Dobbins, Rice, Wagner, & Schacter, 2003;Nyberg et al, 1995;Yonelinas, Otten, Shaw, & Rugg, 2005) and which are related to mediating domaingeneral cognitive control processes including strategic ordering and controlled selection processes, to name a few (Moscovitch, 2002;Rajah & McIntosh, 2006;Rowe, Toni, Josephs, Frackowiak, & Passingham, 2000;Schumacher, Elston, & D'Esposito, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Left DL-PFC has also been found in laboratory memory studies that have specifically investigated temporal context memory (Cabeza, et al, 1997;Konishi, et al, 2002;Suzuki, et al, 2002). For example, Suzuki et al (2002) As predicted, we found greater activity in posterior parahippocampal cortex for shorter lags, but the hippocampus activity was sub-threshold.…”
Section: Regions Associated With Reconstruction Processes During Shorsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Specifically, we link the effect of chronological retrieval in the precuneus with processes involving an active reconstruction of past events [see also St. Jacques et al, 2008], and possibly memory‐related imagery [Fletcher et al, 1995; Ishai et al, 2000]. These processes would characterize temporal order judgments using complex naturalistic material, but not order‐judgment with simpler stimulus material, which previous studies have associated with other brain regions [e.g., middle/prefrontal areas, Suzuki, et al, 2002]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%