1950
DOI: 10.1037/h0055479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
819
2
10

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,564 publications
(852 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
21
819
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The first hypothesis relates to the corollary discharge model already alluded to in the introduction. According to this model (Sperry, 1950;von Holst, 1954), a comparison is made within the central nervous system, between an internally generated signal (which reflects the desired movement) and other central signals, anticipating the consequences of this movement. The study of visuomotor behaviour in normal subjects clearly supports the existence of such a mechanism for accounting for the generation of fast and automatic correcting movements during reaching at small targets, for example (see Jeannerod, 1988 for review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first hypothesis relates to the corollary discharge model already alluded to in the introduction. According to this model (Sperry, 1950;von Holst, 1954), a comparison is made within the central nervous system, between an internally generated signal (which reflects the desired movement) and other central signals, anticipating the consequences of this movement. The study of visuomotor behaviour in normal subjects clearly supports the existence of such a mechanism for accounting for the generation of fast and automatic correcting movements during reaching at small targets, for example (see Jeannerod, 1988 for review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A, draws on an engineering concept called observer framework and extended earlier thinking on oculomotor control and concepts of "corollary discharge" and "efference copies" (Helmholtz, 1866;Sperry, 1950;von Holst and Mittelstaedt, 1950). The observer framework illustrates how i) predictive processing using forward models and ii) actual reafferent feedback are combined to efficiently control and improve sensorimotor control without the need for additional conscious monitoring.…”
Section: Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the forward model, this happens before any sensory feedback is available. One advantage of the forward model is that movements can be planned and adjusted without the need to wait for sensory feedback which can be delayed by up to 250 ms (Miall et al, 1993), which is one of the reasons why such models have first been proposed for ballistic movements, such as eye movements (Sperry, 1950;von Holst and Mittelstaedt, 1950). Simultaneously, the sensory consequences of the action are predicted using a sensory forward model (lower branch, Fig.…”
Section: Automatic Sensorimotor Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been confirmed that during IE performed after muscle glycogen reduction, integrated electromyogram (iEMG) activity recorded in exercising muscle, which reflects central motor command (Amann et al 2006;Amann and Dempsey 2008), does not increase while ventilation is elevated (Osborne and Schneider 2006;Perrey et al 2003;Yamanaka et al 2012). These findings indicate the possibility that although ventilatory response to IE is related to effort sense, an increase in motor drive from the motor cortex to exercising muscles, which may produce effort sense via efference copy/corollary discharge mechanisms (Marcora 2009;Sperry 1950;Von Holst 1954), is not always required for the augmented ventilatory response to IE (Yamanaka et al 5 5 2012;Yunoki 2012). Thus, the mechanism of effort-mediated ventilatory response during IE remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%