2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00178-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural cell adhesion molecule expression in renal cell carcinomas: relation to metastatic behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The therapeutic use of anti-NCAM antibodies will be limited, however, by the possibility that metastasis formation may be enhanced through NCAM blocking. NCAM expression tends to be lost in metastatic lesions [18][19][20]23 and, conversely, aberrant expression of L1-CAM in carcinomas was reported to enhance tumor growth and cell migration. According to the herein reported findings, both conditions would augment tumor cell recognition by NK cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The therapeutic use of anti-NCAM antibodies will be limited, however, by the possibility that metastasis formation may be enhanced through NCAM blocking. NCAM expression tends to be lost in metastatic lesions [18][19][20]23 and, conversely, aberrant expression of L1-CAM in carcinomas was reported to enhance tumor growth and cell migration. According to the herein reported findings, both conditions would augment tumor cell recognition by NK cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 NCAM expression is a marker for neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung 14,15 and in other organs. 16,17 Aberrant expression has also been detected in renal cell carcinoma, 18 pancreatic adenocarcinoma and b cell tumors, 19,20 in tumors of the salivary gland 21 and gall bladder, 22 and cases of breast and colon carcinoma. 23,24 In line with the adhesive functions of NCAM, low or absent NCAM expression in carcinomas was correlated with a metastatic phenotype and poor survival rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In majority of the studies, high numbers of immune cells, such as natural killer (NK) cells or CD8+T cells, infiltrating the tumors have been shown to correlate with an improved prognosis for cancer patients (Coca et al, 1997;Deschoolmeester et al, 2010). Elevated CD56+NK cell count has been reported to be associated with a lower risk of progression in prostate cancer (Gannon et al, 2009), and with poor patient outcome in renal cell carcinoma (Daniel et al, 2003). In the present study, analysis of response to treatment and survival, using log rank test after a 4 year follow up period, showed that the patients with low CD56 intratumoral count had better survival than high CD56 intratumoral count (χ2=4.80, p<0.05), with 0.52 fold lower death rate as compared to patients with high CD56 intratumoral count (HR=0.52, 95% CI=0.28-0.93).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the diagnostic armamentarium, CD56 is a specific histological immune marker for malignant nervous tumors like medulloblastoma and astrocytoma, malignant NK/T-cell lymphomas (NK/T-NHLs), and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Its over expression in malignant cells is linked with an aggressive tumor type, insufficient therapeutic response, and a reduced survival time in different malignancies including lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias (ALLs/AML), malignant melanoma (Johnson, 1999;Abbott et al, 2004), and different cancers (Pujol et al, 1993;Zoltowska et al, 2001;Daniel et al, 2003Choi et al, 2004Cho et al, 2006;Evans et al, 2006;). It has been reported in different types of epithelial malignancies and sarcomas like Ewings /PNET (McKenzie et al, 1981;Lipinski et al, 1987;Gardner et al, 1998;Farinola et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%