2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
91
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Far less attention has been paid to higher-order statistics in audition (10,11). However, there is good evidence that auditory cortical representations decreasingly correspond with physical stimulus dimensions (21,29,30), and this may be similar to the loss of acoustic dimensions (AD, SS) seen here, as more efficient dimensions better capture perceptual performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Far less attention has been paid to higher-order statistics in audition (10,11). However, there is good evidence that auditory cortical representations decreasingly correspond with physical stimulus dimensions (21,29,30), and this may be similar to the loss of acoustic dimensions (AD, SS) seen here, as more efficient dimensions better capture perceptual performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Although overall responses were not significantly more sparse in A1 than ICc, a prominent hypothesis for sound coding at higher levels of the central auditory pathways holds that the sustained nature of stimulus-evoked responses, rather than the overall rate, is indicative of stimulus preference Wang, 2007). Namely, responses in A1 single units in awake an- E, Peak firing rates from A1 (blue) and ICc (red) were calculated as the peak 50 ms response bin across all stimuli presented.…”
Section: A1 Neurons Display a Sparse Code Across Some Acoustic Dimensmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As an extension of these ideas, in a system where stimulus representation is progressively less linear as one ascends the processing hierarchy, at each stage the most efficient stimulus representation would be increasingly sparse. This hypothesis has been made in the visual (Willmore et al, 2011) and auditory (Wang, 2007;Atencio et al, 2012) systems.…”
Section: A1 Neurons Display a Sparse Code Across Some Acoustic Dimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because systematically covarying stimulus properties collapse into more efficient representations at the expense of separate redundant properties. Consistent with this principle, Wang (2007) describes "non-isomorphic" transformations that occur progressively along the ascending auditory pathway, making neural representations "further away from physical (acoustical) structures of sounds, but presumably closer to internal representations underlying perception" (p. 92). Examples of non-isomorphic representations in auditory cortex include encoding spectral shape across varying absolute frequencies (Barbour and Wang, 2003), gross representation of rapid change in click trains with short inter-click intervals versus phase-locking to trains with slower inter-click intervals (Lu and Wang, 2000;Lu et al, 2001), pitch versus individual frequency components Wang, 2005, 2006), and different components of auditory scenes (Nelken and Bar-Yosef, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%