2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Collaborative Graph Machines for Table Structure Recognition

Abstract: Recently, Table Structure Recognition (TSR) task, aiming at identifying table structure into machine readable formats, has received increasing interest in the community. While impressive success, most single table componentbased methods can not perform well on unregularized table cases distracted by not only complicated inner structure but also exterior capture distortion. In this paper, we raise it as Complex TSR problem, where the performance degeneration of existing methods is attributable to their ineffici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among, the first three columns indicate the performance on recognizing complex tables containing more severe distractors. Compared with existing methods, the F1-score of our GrabTab can beat the second best method, NCGM (Liu et al 2022), by 4.5% on SciTSR-COMP-A dataset, while the apparent performance improvement is also witnessed on WTW and SciTSR-COMP datasets. This phenomenon further confirms that simply focusing on single component extraction is not the optimal solution.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among, the first three columns indicate the performance on recognizing complex tables containing more severe distractors. Compared with existing methods, the F1-score of our GrabTab can beat the second best method, NCGM (Liu et al 2022), by 4.5% on SciTSR-COMP-A dataset, while the apparent performance improvement is also witnessed on WTW and SciTSR-COMP datasets. This phenomenon further confirms that simply focusing on single component extraction is not the optimal solution.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As aforementioned, our GrabTab extracts table elements and their relations as candidate components, which is expected to provide useful information for the chief separator component. To achieve this goal, we inherit the relation extraction method from a off-the-shell work, NCGM (Liu et al 2022). Specifically, for N table elements, the "collaborative graph embeddings" output by NCGM is employed as element tokens in our GrabTab: E ele = {e 1 , e 2 , ..., e N } ∈ R N ×de .…”
Section: Candidate Components Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations