2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/acii.2015.7344679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural conditional ordinal random fields for agreement level estimation

Abstract: Abstract-We present a novel approach to automated estimation of agreement intensity levels from facial images. To this end, we employ the MAHNOB Mimicry database of subjects recorded during dyadic interactions, where the facial images are annotated in terms of agreement intensity levels using the Likert scale (strong disagreement, disagreement, neutral, agreement and strong agreement). Dynamic modelling of the agreement levels is accomplished by means of a Conditional Ordinal Random Field model. Specifically, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other lines of work deal with the analysis of (dis)agreement expression channels and verbal/non-verbal cues [6], [1], estimation based on lexical and text-based data [7], as well as audio and prosody cues [8]. Due to the variety of means by which the (dis)agreement can be communicated, we adopt the multi-level annotation scale introduced in [9]. The agreement levels are represented using Likert scale [10], where the intensity of agreement ranges from strong disagreement to strong agreement.…”
Section: A Agreement Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Other lines of work deal with the analysis of (dis)agreement expression channels and verbal/non-verbal cues [6], [1], estimation based on lexical and text-based data [7], as well as audio and prosody cues [8]. Due to the variety of means by which the (dis)agreement can be communicated, we adopt the multi-level annotation scale introduced in [9]. The agreement levels are represented using Likert scale [10], where the intensity of agreement ranges from strong disagreement to strong agreement.…”
Section: A Agreement Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement levels are represented using Likert scale [10], where the intensity of agreement ranges from strong disagreement to strong agreement. In particular, the (dis)agreement levels are defined as: neutral {0}, (dis)agreement {-1,+1}, strong (dis)agreement {-2,+2} as defined in [9].…”
Section: A Agreement Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations