2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural control of brain state

Abstract: How the brain takes in information, makes a decision, and acts on this decision is strongly influenced by the ongoing and constant fluctuations of state. Understanding the nature of these brain states and how they are controlled is critical to making sense of how the nervous system operates, both normally and abnormally. While broadly projecting neuromodulatory systems acting through metabotropic pathways have long been appreciated to be critical for determining brain state, more recent investigations have rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
127
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
12
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is well known from previous theoretical findings that changing E-I balance changes the state of the network (Brunel, 2000;van Vreeswijk and Sompolinsky, 1996), the simulations further suggest that any mechanism that differentially changes the synaptic dynamics of different types of synapses (e.g., through neuromodulation; for reviews, see Lee and Dan, 2012;Zagha and McCormick, 2014) could alter the boundaries between activity regimes in complex ways. We speculate that other emergent properties, such as UP and DOWN states with two meta-stable fixed points, as observed in vivo (Steriade et al, 1993), which are not reproduced by the digital reconstruction, may require thalamocortical interactions (Hughes et al, 2002), cortico-cortical interactions (Timofeev et al, 2000), intrinsic oscillators (L} orincz et al, 2015;Sanchez-Vives and McCormick, 2000), or neuromodulation (Constantinople and Bruno, 2011;L} orincz et al, 2015;Sigalas et al, 2015).…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…While it is well known from previous theoretical findings that changing E-I balance changes the state of the network (Brunel, 2000;van Vreeswijk and Sompolinsky, 1996), the simulations further suggest that any mechanism that differentially changes the synaptic dynamics of different types of synapses (e.g., through neuromodulation; for reviews, see Lee and Dan, 2012;Zagha and McCormick, 2014) could alter the boundaries between activity regimes in complex ways. We speculate that other emergent properties, such as UP and DOWN states with two meta-stable fixed points, as observed in vivo (Steriade et al, 1993), which are not reproduced by the digital reconstruction, may require thalamocortical interactions (Hughes et al, 2002), cortico-cortical interactions (Timofeev et al, 2000), intrinsic oscillators (L} orincz et al, 2015;Sanchez-Vives and McCormick, 2000), or neuromodulation (Constantinople and Bruno, 2011;L} orincz et al, 2015;Sigalas et al, 2015).…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Two of these are the LC, which provides the source of noradrenergic innervation, and the basal forebrain, which is the source of cholinergic innervation to the cortex49. These neurotransmitters can modulate the state of cortical activity through cell type-specific and subcellular mechanisms565051. Both cholinergic and noradrenergic neurons show graded and transient increases in firing in relation to increased attention to external stimuli, arousal and locomotion13485253.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain state plays an important role in shaping spontaneous neural activity as well as sensory evoked responses (Anderson et al, 2000; Buonomano and Maass, 2009; McCormick et al, 2015; Petersen et al, 2003; Poulet and Petersen, 2008; Zagha and McCormick, 2014) and therefore will impact encoding properties in the sensory pathways. Given that the state of the synapse is a function of activity levels, it follows that reduced synaptic efficacy will be present in thalamocortical neurons during states of arousal or with ongoing neural activity (Boudreau and Ferster, 2005; Castro-Alamancos and Oldford, 2002).…”
Section: Adaptation At the Chemical Synapsementioning
confidence: 99%