Neural correlate of human reciprocity in social interactions

Abstract

Reciprocity plays a key role maintaining cooperation in society. However, little is known about the neural process that underpins human reciprocity during social interactions. Our neuroimaging study manipulated partner identity (computer, human) and strategy (random, tit-for-tat) in repeated prisoner's dilemma games and investigated the neural correlate of reciprocal interaction with humans. Reciprocal cooperation with humans but exploitation of computers by defection was associated with activation in the left amygdala. Amygdala activation was also positively and negatively correlated with a preference change for human partners following tit-for-tat and random strategies, respectively. The correlated activation represented the intensity of positive feeling toward reciprocal and negative feeling toward non-reciprocal partners, and so reflected reciprocity in social interaction. Reciprocity in social interaction, however, might plausibly be misinterpreted and so we also examined the neural coding of insight into the reciprocity of partners. Those with and without insight revealed differential brain activation across the reward-related circuitry (i.e., the right middle dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal caudate) and theory of mind (ToM) regions [i.e., ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and precuneus]. Among differential activations, activation in the precuneus, which accompanied deactivation of the VMPFC, was specific to those without insight into human partners who were engaged in a tit-for-tat strategy. This asymmetric (de)activation might involve specific contributions of ToM regions to the human search for reciprocity. Consequently, the intensity of emotion attached to human reciprocity was represented in the amygdala, whereas insight into the reciprocity of others was reflected in activation across the reward-related and ToM regions. This suggests the critical role of mentalizing, which was not equated with reward expectation during social interactions.

Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick?

“…Her ideas received major impetus from Hickey’s (1997) article on contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives. Hickey (1997) pointed out that “socio-constructivism is prominent in contemporary educational reform efforts” and urged for the expanded study of “new curricular approaches that follow from this perspective.” This has been supported by the recent empirical findings of social neuroscientists on the relationship between social interaction, neural reward (i.e., dopamine production: a hormone and neurotransmitter which plays a major role in reward-motivated behavior) and the motivation to learn (e.g., Redcay et al, 2010 ; Salamone and Correa, 2012 ; Sakaiya et al, 2013 ; Apps and Ramnani, 2014 ).…”

“…Recent conceptual developments and empirical research undertaken by interdisciplinary research groups ( Redcay et al, 2010 ; Krill and Platek, 2012 ; Sakaiya et al, 2013 ; Schilbach et al, 2013 ) support the proposition that the reward-related networks in the human brain are recruited during cooperative social interaction. This is of particular salience to educators who seek classroom instruction and assessment methods that motivate their students to assist each other ( Wood et al, 1976 ; Vygotsky, 1978 ), and sustain that assistance until the learning activity has been completed successfully.…”

Diffusion of responsibility attenuates altruistic punishment: A functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study

“…Third, negative parameter estimates were observed for several brain regions in our study. In particular, parameter estimates for vmPFC and precuneus were negative in all conditions, indicating a “deactivation” instead of an “activation.” Previous studies on decision‐making have observed both vmPFC activations [Aoki et al, ; Tabibnia et al, ; Tricomi et al, ] and deactivations [Rao et al, ; Sakaiya et al, ; Xiang et al, ; Zaki and Mitchell, ]. Notably, deactivations of vmPFC do not confound the interpretation of its functions.…”

Failing as doorman and disc jockey at the same time: Amygdalar dysfunction in Parkinson's disease

“…In social interactions, the intensity of emotion attached to human reciprocity in general is represented by the amygdala . The amygdala both “secures pleasure and avoids pain,” meaning it encodes both aversive and positive stimuli .…”