Neural correlates of audio-visual modal interference inhibition investigated in children by ERP

Abstract

In order to detect cross-sectional age characteristics of cognitive neural mechanisms in audio-visual modal interference inhibition, event-related potentials (ERP) of 14 10-year-old children were recorded while performing the words interference task. In incongruent conditions, the participants were required to inhibit the audio interference words of the same category. The present findings provided the preliminary evidence of brain mechanism for the children's inhibition development in the specific childhood stage. audio-visual modal, interference, inhibition, event-related potentials (ERP) Citation:Wang Y W, Lin C D, Liang J, et al. Neural correlates of audio-visual modal interference inhibition investigated in children by ERP. Sci China Life

Event-Related Brain Potentials Associated With the Olfactory-Visual Stroop Effect and Its Modulation by Olfactory-Induced Emotional States

“…By contrast, the stimuli in the cross-modal Stroop task are presented at different physical locations on different sensory channels (e.g., taste and vision) and processed through different primary cortices. Therefore, it has been proposed that interference effect indexed by the incongruent-vs.-congruent ND waveform in cross-modal Stroop tasks could be delayed as a result of the integration of cross-modal sensory signals (Wang et al, 2011;Xiao et al, 2014). Consistent with this view, we also expected a delayed ND waveform in our cross-modal olfactory-visual Stroop task.…”

“…First, the incongruent-vs.-congruent difference ERP component recorded in classic unimodal Stroop tasks usually shows a negative deflection with a fronto-central topography that peaks between 350 and 550 ms post-stimulus, and this component has been associated with selective attention and cognitive control (Liotti et al, 2000;Markela-Lerenc et al, 2004;Qiu et al, 2006). Second, a similar ERP component has been reported in cross-modal Stroop tasks and has been interpreted as reflecting cross-modal cognitive control exerted through attentional processes (Wang et al, 2011;Xiao et al, 2014).…”

Trust Game Database: Behavioral and EEG Data From Two Trust Games

“…In recent years, with the development of brain imaging technology, many researchers have tried to answer the above question from the perspective of the neural mechanism of trust. Due to the non-invasive and high time resolution characteristics (i.e., millisecond, Wang et al, 2011;Mu et al, 2016), the electroencephalogram (EEG) was widely used in such trust-related studies to examine the neural dynamics of trust behaviors (Wang et al, 2016(Wang et al, , 2017. However, compared to behavioral research, the EEG study often takes more time and money.…”

P300 amplitude at Pz and N200/N300 latency at F3 differ between participants simulating suspect versus witness roles in a mock crime

“…To select a putative ERP sign of inhibition for the present study, we reviewed the large and complex literature relating frontal (left, central, and right) cortical activity (e.g., N200s, N300s, BOLD responses) to various kinds of inhibitory processes in various paradigms (e.g., Armilio, 2002;Aron, Monsell, Sahakian, & Robbins, 2004;Debruille, Brodeur, & Franco Porras, 2012;Fahrenfort, Scholte, & Lamme, 2008;Falkenstein, Hoormann, & Hohnsbein, 1999, Folstein & Van Petten, 2008Ganis, Bridges, Chun-Wei, & Schendan, 2016;Ganis & Schendan, 2013;Holroyd, 2004;Picton et al, 2007;Swick, Ashley, & Turken, 2008;van Gaal, Ridderinkhof, Fehrenfort, Scholte, & Lamme, 2008;Wang, Lin, Liang, Wang, & Zhang, 2011;for review, see Huster, Enriquez-Geppert, Lavallee, Falkenstein, & Herrmann, 2013). The negative component processes seen in some of these references tend to peak around 300 ms even though they were often called N200 (e.g., Falkenstein et al, 1999).…”