2010
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Contents and Levels of Consciousness

Abstract: Experimental investigations of the neural substrate of consciousness typically take one of two paths, studying (1) contents or (2) levels of consciousness. It seems obvious to most that these two “paths” are interrelated, yet much less obvious how. This paper gives one suggestion to grasp the interrelation, arguing that conscious levels are determined by conscious contents in a very specific way. It follows from the argument that conscious contents are so-called natural kinds, whereas conscious levels are not.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously discussed by several authors in the literature (Baars, 1988;Frith, 2011;Zeman, 2001), consciousness continues to be an ill-defined concept. When scientifically approaching NCC, there is an important distinction to be made between the level and the contents of consciousness (Dehaene and Changeux, 2005;Frith, 2011;Overgaard and Overgaard, 2010). In the present context, consciousness is defined as what disappears during dreamless sleep (Tononi, 2008): the ability to perceive anything.…”
Section: Diagnosing Consciousness: Level Versus Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously discussed by several authors in the literature (Baars, 1988;Frith, 2011;Zeman, 2001), consciousness continues to be an ill-defined concept. When scientifically approaching NCC, there is an important distinction to be made between the level and the contents of consciousness (Dehaene and Changeux, 2005;Frith, 2011;Overgaard and Overgaard, 2010). In the present context, consciousness is defined as what disappears during dreamless sleep (Tononi, 2008): the ability to perceive anything.…”
Section: Diagnosing Consciousness: Level Versus Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other relates to specific perceptual experiences, such as hearing a trumpet or smelling a rose, referred to as the 'contents of consciousness'. Following early suggestions that conscious level may be related to the phenomenological diversity of experience 1, 2 , there has been increasing interest in characterising the interaction between conscious level and conscious content 3 , with recent attempts describing states of consciousness as regions within a multidimensional space 3,4 . Bayne et al (2016) propose that one dimension along which conscious states differ is how they 'gate' conscious content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that an EEG signal can be completely described in terms of its spectral power and phase, what then does LZs add to the description of the signal? One response is that while changes in the amplitude of a particular frequency band are important when describing states of consciousness, for example increased delta power(1)(2)(3)(4) during NREM, there is no single spectral band that displays the same sensitivity to states of consciousness in an analogous manner to LZs. LZs captures the spontaneous signal diversity of brain activity -with the theoretically-motivated link to phenomenological diversity -whereas there is no such obvious relationship with any single spectral band.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinction between general and specific consciousness corresponds roughly to the existing distinction between the “level” and the “content” of consciousness (Hohwy, 2009; Overgaard and Overgaard, 2010; Bachmann, 2012). However, since we are using the term “content” in the technical way defined above, we will continue to use the general/specific terminology instead.…”
Section: Framing the Problem(s) Of Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 61%