2018
DOI: 10.1177/1545968318812726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Hypokinetic Dysarthria and Mechanisms of Effective Voice Treatment in Parkinson Disease

Abstract: Supplementary material for this article is available on the Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair website along with the online version of the article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given previously reported hyperactivity in the speech motor networks in individuals with PD during speech production (Liotti et al, 2003;Pinto et al, 2004;Rektorova et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2016), one might predict a decrease of cortical brain activity that is accompanied by improved auditory-vocal integration. This is in contrast with increased cortical activity following LSVT LOUD observed in the present and previous studies (Narayana et al, 2010;Baumann et al, 2018). However, there is evidence showing that improved hypokinetic dysarthria by LSVT LOUD is accompanied by increased activation in the right DLPFC, anterior insula, and basal ganglia and decreased activation in the motor/premotor regions (Liotti et al, 2003).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms Of Efficacy Of Lsvt Loudcontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Given previously reported hyperactivity in the speech motor networks in individuals with PD during speech production (Liotti et al, 2003;Pinto et al, 2004;Rektorova et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2016), one might predict a decrease of cortical brain activity that is accompanied by improved auditory-vocal integration. This is in contrast with increased cortical activity following LSVT LOUD observed in the present and previous studies (Narayana et al, 2010;Baumann et al, 2018). However, there is evidence showing that improved hypokinetic dysarthria by LSVT LOUD is accompanied by increased activation in the right DLPFC, anterior insula, and basal ganglia and decreased activation in the motor/premotor regions (Liotti et al, 2003).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms Of Efficacy Of Lsvt Loudcontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The abovementioned correlations and increased activation in the ACC mostly involved the right-sided hemispheric regions. This accords well with the described right-sided functional brain reorganization due to the successful LSVT [14,15]. However, it seems that the increased engagement of these regions did not fully compensate for vocal muscle bradykinesia in our patients.…”
Section: Fmri Results: Reading Task-induced Activationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In PD, only a few functional imaging studies have explored the neural mechanisms of HD symptoms, with inconsistent results probably due to varied methodologies and patient populations [1]. In general, deficits in the basal ganglia and cerebellar activation and connectivity as well as altered functional connection of the STG have been described [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is in response to this challenge that we must expand our research and investigative faculties to design new and more targeted studies, looking deeper into the patient population than symptomology and presentation alone. We now have the resources to investigate areas such as genetic predisposition, anatomic and functional differences on functional magnetic resonance imaging, and medical comorbidities in the case of vocal fold disorders (Baumann et al, 2018;Fisher et al, 2008;Lovett, 2014;Morgan et al, 2013;Shuster, 2003). It is with the creative use of these parameters that we can expand our understanding of the diseases we seek to treat and to further refine our treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the inevitable change in approach that occurs with continued investigation is the addition of new technologies. Blood tests (e.g., Bridgemohan et al, 2019;Mohammadi et al, 2018;Sanz et al, 2012), biopsies (e.g., Hanshew et al, 2014;Thibeault et al, 2002), magnetic resonance imaging scans (e.g., Baumann et al, 2018;Kryshtopava et al, 2017), genetic testing (e.g., Duflo et al, 2006;Peng et al, 2018), and so forth provide different information than symptomology alone, and these technologies are becoming more and more widely used in speech pathology research. It is now an opportune time to expand our tool set to include more of the biologically based technologies for detection of disorderrelated differences at a protein and genome level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%