Neural Correlates of Motor Imagery, Action Observation, and Movement Execution: A Comparison Across Quantitative Meta-Analyses

Abstract

There is longstanding interest in the relationship between motor imagery, action observation, and movement execution. Several models propose that these tasks recruit the same brain regions in a similar manner; however, there is no quantitative synthesis of the literature that compares their respective networks. Here we summarized data from neuroimaging experiments examining Motor Imagery (303 experiments, 4,902 participants), Action Observation (595 experiments, 11,032 participants), and related control tasks involving Movement Execution (142 experiments, 2,302 participants). Motor Imagery recruited a network of premotor-parietal cortical regions, alongside the thalamus, putamen, and cerebellum. Action Observation involved a cortical premotor-parietal and occipital network, with no consistent subcortical contributions. Movement Execution engaged sensorimotor-premotor areas, and the thalamus, putamen, and cerebellum. Comparisons across these networks highlighted key differences in their recruitment of motor cortex and parietal cortex, and subcortical structures. Conjunction across all three tasks identified a consistent premotor-parietal and somatosensory network. These data amend previous models of the relationships between motor imagery, action observation, and movement execution, and quantify the relationships between their respective networks.Keywords: Action Simulation, Motor Simulation, Functional Equivalence, Mental Imagery, Action Observation System, Mirror Neurons Highlights:• We compared quantitative meta-analyses of movement imagery, observation, and execution• Subcortical structures were most commonly associated with imagery and execution• Conjunctions identified a consistent premotor-parietal-somatosensory network• These data can inform basic and translational work using imagery and observation . CC-BY 4.0 International license peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a

Simultaneous and alternate action observation and motor imagery combinations improve aiming performance

“…Indeed, there is some neuroscientific evidence that could support this. For example, Filimon et al (2015) and Hardwick et al (2017) have showed that whilst both AO and MI activate the similar areas of the brain (e.g., the premotor cortex), AO activates some areas more (e.g., inferior frontal gyrus; ventral premotor areas) than MI and MI activates other areas more strongly (e.g., angular gyrus; dorsal premotor area) than AO. Given this evidence, it is possible that S-AOMI (i.e., combining both approaches concurrently) would produce increased and more widespread, activity in the premotor cortex than A-AOMI does and this is what produces beneficial motor learning effects.…”

Directing visual attention during action observation modulates corticospinal excitability

“…It is well-established that action observation elicits activity in various motor regions of the brain [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Furthermore, the manipulation of attention during action observation can modulate activity within the motor system.…”

Motor Imagery Development in Children: Changes in Speed and Accuracy With Increasing Age

“…According to Jeannerod (8), imagined movements are functionally equivalent to those performed physically in terms of intentions, motor planning, and motor program engagement. In fact, functional neuroimaging studies have shown that MI activates a set of neural networks (parietal, frontal motor, and cerebellar areas) that partially overlap the brain network that is activated during motor performance (9)(10)(11)(12). Thus, as MI and motor execution are closely related processes, MI is increasingly being explored to improve motor skill acquisition by stimulating the neural networks underlying movement planning and control (2,13,14).…”