2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of performance on the different scoring systems of the clock drawing test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These group differences were observed when clocks were scored according to the Rouleau scoring system [41], but were not observed with other methods, reflecting the sensitivity of this system to spatial arrangements among clock features. This finding accords with those of Lee and colleagues [44] and Matsuoka and colleagues [45] in Alzheimer’s disease, who reported that Rouleau scores correlated more strongly than did other-system scores with right-parietal structure (i.e. grey matter volume) and function (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These group differences were observed when clocks were scored according to the Rouleau scoring system [41], but were not observed with other methods, reflecting the sensitivity of this system to spatial arrangements among clock features. This finding accords with those of Lee and colleagues [44] and Matsuoka and colleagues [45] in Alzheimer’s disease, who reported that Rouleau scores correlated more strongly than did other-system scores with right-parietal structure (i.e. grey matter volume) and function (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, anchorers compared to non-anchorers had higher local efficiency for the left medial OFC, the right rostral ACC and the right SFG as well as the left temporal gyrus that includes Heschl's gyrus. In general terms, several of these regions were hypothesized to be involved in CDT performance and graphomotor organization more specifically based on previous research in normal and pathological aging (Ino, et al, 2003; Lee, et al, 2008; Matsuoka, et al, 2011; Thomann, Toro, Dos Santos, Essig, & Schroder, 2008; Tranel, et al, 2008). We did not, however, find support for parietal involvement in anchoring behavior; this may be due, in part, to the fact that our local efficiency results may represent a relative advantage for anchorers with respect to the connectivity of neurocircuits responsible for the activation, control, and regulation of visually guided motor acts (Izquierdo, Suda, & Murray, 2004; Koechlin, Ody, & Kouneiher, 2003).…”
Section: 0 Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, evidence suggests the CDT requires executive functioning during the Command condition (Cohen, et al, 2014; Cosentino, et al, 2004) when participants must initiate, unassisted, CDT task demands. Likewise, a larger brain network including prefrontal as well as right parietal and bilateral temporal regions is thought to be involved in Command condition performance compared to Copy and/or ‘pre-drawn’ CDT trials (Matsuoka, et al, 2011). Thus, spontaneous graphomotor organization during the CDT Command condition, e.g., deliberately placing the 12, 6, 3, and/or 9 to ensure adequate spacing of all numbers, may promote executive functioning in the form of greater efficiency during the task.…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PD-patients with a flawless CDT-performance did not show this association (see Figure 2). The neuroanatomical correlates of Clock Drawing Test performance were investigated in several studies, but the findings are inconsistent [4952]. This discrepancy might probably stem from the fact that the Clock Drawing Test measures also executive function, numerical and verbal memory, and visuospatial ability [34, 53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%