“…Although this fact might suggest a chronological process in bvFTD, this could not be confirmed with our data sample, as the investigated MRI and FDG-PET cohorts did only partly overlap. Accordingly, further longitudinal studies have to explore whether the different imaging approaches mirror a topographical and chronological hierarchical ‘nexopathic’ model as suggested for Alzheimer’s disease previously, where regional hypometabolism, presumably due to diaschisis/disconnection effects, is followed by regional atrophy (Chételat et al, 2008; Dukart et al, 2013b; Jack et al, 2010; Villain et al, 2008; Woost et al, 2013). The (meta-analytically) identified prototypical networks might be used as ‘hubs or networks of interest’ to increase individual diagnostic accuracy based on multimodal imaging and machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine classification (Dukart et al, 2011, 2013a), and to further the disease’s understanding with connectivity analyses (Farb et al, 2013; Filippi et al, 2013; Jech et al, 2013; Mueller et al, 2013; Seeley et al, 2009; Warren et al, 2012; Zhou et al, 2012).…”