1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf00271512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of the optomotor response in the fly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These anatomical findings corroborated earlier extracellular recordings which demonstrated that there are directionally selective motion detecting units (DSMDs) present in the lobula plate region which show a pronounced preference for patterns moved in the horizontal and vertical planes (Bishop and Keehn, 1967;Bishop et al, 1969;McCann and Dill, 1969;McCann and Foster, 1971;McCann, 1973). Moreover, from behavioural experiments it was concluded that in the fly there is a functional separation of the horizontal and vertical inputs to the movement detection systems which control optomotor behaviour (G~Stz, 1968(G~Stz, , 1972.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These anatomical findings corroborated earlier extracellular recordings which demonstrated that there are directionally selective motion detecting units (DSMDs) present in the lobula plate region which show a pronounced preference for patterns moved in the horizontal and vertical planes (Bishop and Keehn, 1967;Bishop et al, 1969;McCann and Dill, 1969;McCann and Foster, 1971;McCann, 1973). Moreover, from behavioural experiments it was concluded that in the fly there is a functional separation of the horizontal and vertical inputs to the movement detection systems which control optomotor behaviour (G~Stz, 1968(G~Stz, , 1972.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since the class II-I unit, discovered earlier in the fly visual system (Bishop et al 1967(Bishop et al , 1968, has been definitely identified as H I by means of intracellular staining (Hausen 1976), this neuron is the only individually identifiable DS motion-sensitive cell known in the animal world that can pride itself on having been consistently investigated for 20 years, thereby giving rise to an impressive body of data (see also Lillywhite and Dvorak 1981;Eriksson 1982;Srinivasan and Dvorak 1980;Srinivasan 1983;BUlthoff and Schmid 1983;Maddess 1986).…”
Section: The Correlation Model Of Motion Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3). The two bilaterally symmetrical H I cells appear to be involved in the control of optomotortorque responses (Bishop et al 1967;Eckert 1980;Hausen 1981). The two HI neurons exert mutual inhibition, a feature that makes each particularly sensitive to either clockwise or anticlockwise rotatory (yaw) motion of the visual environment, as experienced by the fly when it performs a turn (McCann and Foster 1971;Hausen 1984).…”
Section: The Correlation Model Of Motion Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…New implications for the neural mechanisms of visuomotor reflexes For decades, visually mediated reflexes in insects have been used as behavioral assays to predict and examine structure-function relationships within the nervous system at both the cellular (Bishop and Keehn, 1967;Hassenstein and Reichardt, 1956) and molecular-genetic levels (Fischbach and Heisenberg, 1984;Götz, 1964a) presented here therefore initializes both a search for new physiological mechanisms and a reinterpretation of current advances. Most electrophysiological studies of visual processing in flies have focused on a group of 60 or so motion-sensitive cells in the lobula plate (Hausen, 1984(Hausen, , 1993.…”
Section: Model For the Spatial Summation Of Translational Flow Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%