Hypothesis
Preimplantation word scores cannot reliably predict postimplantation outcomes.
Background
To date, there is no model based on preoperative data that can reliably predict the postoperative outcomes of cochlear implantation in the postlingually deafened adult patient.
Methods
In a group of 228 patients who received a cochlear implant between 2002 and 2021, we tested the predictive power of nine variables (age, etiology, sex, laterality of implantation, preimplantation thresholds and word scores, as well as the design, insertion approach, and angular insertion depth of the electrode array) on postimplantation outcomes. Results of multivariable linear regression analyses were then interpreted in light of data obtained from histopathological analyses of human temporal bones.
Results
Age and etiology were the only significant predictors of postimplantation outcomes. In agreement with many investigations, preimplantation word scores failed to significantly predict postimplantation outcomes. Analysis of temporal bone histopathology suggests that neuronal survival must fall below 40% before word scores in quiet begin to drop. Scores fall steeply with further neurodegeneration, such that only 20% survival can support acoustically driven word scores of 50%. Because almost all cochlear implant implantees have at least 20% of their spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) surviving, it is expected that most cochlear implant users on average should improve to at least 50% word recognition score, as we observed, even if their preimplantation score was near zero as a result of widespread hair cell damage and the fact that ~50% of their SGNs have likely lost their peripheral axons. These “disconnected” SGNs would not contribute to acoustic hearing but likely remain electrically excitable.
Conclusion
The relationship between preimplantation word scores and data describing the survival of SGNs in humans can explain why preimplantation word scores obtained in unaided conditions fail to predict postimplantation outcomes.
