2013
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1511-13.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Dynamics of Phonological Processing in the Dorsal Auditory Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These areas are activated not only during speech production tasks but also in speech perception tasks, particularly when the speech input is noisy (Chevillet et al, 2013; Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Liebenthal et al, in press; Meister et al, 2007; Okada and Hickok, 2006). It has been postulated that such auditory-motor interactions may be particularly important during speech development (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007), and it is possible that, prior to full mastery of phonemic categorization, auditory-motor associations may play a significant role in facilitating or guiding phoneme perception (Callan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas are activated not only during speech production tasks but also in speech perception tasks, particularly when the speech input is noisy (Chevillet et al, 2013; Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Liebenthal et al, in press; Meister et al, 2007; Okada and Hickok, 2006). It has been postulated that such auditory-motor interactions may be particularly important during speech development (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007), and it is possible that, prior to full mastery of phonemic categorization, auditory-motor associations may play a significant role in facilitating or guiding phoneme perception (Callan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because categorical speech perception requires the listener to maintain sublexical representations in an active state as a metalinguistic judgment is made, it involves some degree of executive control and working memory functions (1). Thus, the linearly prolonged RT and incremental BOLD activity in the PMv, IFG, pSTG, and IPL with increasing task difficulty likely reflect an accumulation of effort-related changes in selective attention (33), phonological working memory (20,(26)(27)(28), or phoneme-category judgment and response selection (5,8,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is robust to individual anatomical variability, is sensitive to small differences in activation, and provides a powerful tool for examining the processes underlying speech categorization (25). We predicted that (i) because the dorsal auditory stream (i.e., IFG, PMC, pSTG, and IPL) supporting sensorimotor integration is activated as a result of task-related speech perception (5,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and phonological working memory processes (26)(27)(28), the mean BOLD activity in those regions would negatively correlate with SNR-manipulated accuracy (increasing activity with increasing difficulty), supporting the compensatory recruitment of the SMS under adverse listening conditions; (ii) to implement effective forward sensorimotor mapping, the SMS would exhibit stronger multivoxel phoneme discrimination than auditory regions under noisy listening conditions; and (iii) when SNR decreases, the difference in phoneme discriminability between the SMS and auditory regions may increase linearly, or increase first and then decrease at a certain SNR level because of failed forward prediction processes under extensive noise interference. That is, the efficiency of the forward mapping would adaptively change with SNR in a linear or a convex pattern, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left temporoparietal activity during the repetition of nonwords correlates with phonological-lexical learning and is associated with the retrieval of whole word phonology (Majerus et al, 2005;Graves, Grabowski, Mehta, & Gupta, 2008). Moreover, the left supramarginal gyrus has been specifically linked with the perception (e.g., Jacquemot, Pallier, LeBihan, Dehaene, & Dupoux, 2003;Raizada & Poldrack, 2007;Turkeltaub & Coslett, 2010;Liebenthal, Sabri, Beardsley, Mangalathu-Arumana, & Desai, 2013) and sequencing of phoneme segments (Gelfand & Bookheimer, 2003;Moser, Baker, Sanchez, Rorden, & Fridriksson, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%