Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2018/226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Framework for Joint Evolution Modeling of User Feedback and Social Links in Dynamic Social Networks

Abstract: Modeling the evolution of user feedback and social links in dynamic social networks is of considerable significance, because it is the basis of many applications, including recommendation systems and user behavior analyses. Most of the existing methods in this area model user behaviors separately and consider only certain aspects of this problem, such as dynamic preferences of users, dynamic attributes of items, evolutions of social networks, and their partial integration. This work proposes a comprehensive ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social recommendation has emerged in these platforms, with the goal to model the social influence and social correlation among users to boost recommendation performance. The underlying reason for social recommendation is the existence of social influence among social neighbors, leading to the correlation of users' interests in a social network [145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151]. We summarize the social recommendation models into the following two categories: the social correlation enhancement and regularization models, and GNN based models.…”
Section: Modeling Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social recommendation has emerged in these platforms, with the goal to model the social influence and social correlation among users to boost recommendation performance. The underlying reason for social recommendation is the existence of social influence among social neighbors, leading to the correlation of users' interests in a social network [145], [146], [147], [148], [149], [150], [151]. We summarize the social recommendation models into the following two categories: the social correlation enhancement and regularization models, and GNN based models.…”
Section: Modeling Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the real-world, users' interests are dynamic over time due to users' personal interests change and the varying social influence strengths. Researchers extended the social correlation based model with RNN to model the evolution of users' preferences under dynamic social influences [146], [147]. Specifically, for each user u, her latent preferences h t a at time t could be modeled as the transition from her previous latent preference h t−1 u , as well as the social influence from social neighbors at t − 1 as:…”
Section: Modeling Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendation. In social recommendation, we have social networks that contain the social relations of each user, and the goal is to utilize the local neighbors' preferences for each user in social networks to enhance the user modeling [17,138,165,166]. From the perspective of representation learning with GNN, there are two key considerations in social recommendation: 1) how to capture the social factor; 2) how to combine the social factor from friends and user preference from his/her interaction behaviors.…”
Section: Gnn In Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complicated social effects occurring amongst viewers watching common channels are not carefully examined. On the other hand, existing social-aware recommendations [30,32] only infer personal satisfaction based on social topology, which is not designed for MSP where viewers watch live streaming channels together. Hence, we parameterize MSP personal satisfaction from personal, social, and streamer relation aspects, to design a new ranking model CARS to quantify the satisfaction of different combinations of channels and friends.…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.1.3 Evaluation Metrics. In Section 6.2, the evaluation on donation recommendations is based on Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) [32,34]. For tensor factorization, we evaluate the average reconstruction loss with respect to donation and response tensors.…”
Section: Channel Influence-aware Msp Ranking System (Cars)mentioning
confidence: 99%