2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Koopman Lyapunov control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A principled approach, however, that guarantees some form of stability is largely lacking. Progress has been made when it comes to handling side-information [AEK20], obtaining statistical stability guarantees [Bof+21], in the context of input-state stability under CTRNN modelling assumptions [Yan+22], in the context of input-output stability by exploiting the Hamilton-Jacobi inequality [OK22], by exploiting contraction theory [Rez+22] and by exploiting Koopman operator theory [ZB22], to name a few. As these methods are data-driven, errors inevitably slip in and great care must be taken when one aims to mimic CLF-based controllers, i.e., if L g V (x) = 0 =⇒ L f V (x) < 0 holds for the estimated system, does it hold for the real system and what happens if it does not?…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A principled approach, however, that guarantees some form of stability is largely lacking. Progress has been made when it comes to handling side-information [AEK20], obtaining statistical stability guarantees [Bof+21], in the context of input-state stability under CTRNN modelling assumptions [Yan+22], in the context of input-output stability by exploiting the Hamilton-Jacobi inequality [OK22], by exploiting contraction theory [Rez+22] and by exploiting Koopman operator theory [ZB22], to name a few. As these methods are data-driven, errors inevitably slip in and great care must be taken when one aims to mimic CLF-based controllers, i.e., if L g V (x) = 0 =⇒ L f V (x) < 0 holds for the estimated system, does it hold for the real system and what happens if it does not?…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found the most application to be the minimum-fuel orbital rendezvous. One approach employed Koopman Map Inversion to obtain a linearized model for optimal control [66], while another approach demonstrated Neural Koopman Lyapunov Control for linearizing a generalized affine system [76]. Minimization of the Frobenius norm was performed on a similarly affine thrust-vectoring application using the pseudo-inverse to directly solve for the Koopman operator [32].…”
Section: Space Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%