2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10590-020-09255-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural machine translation with a polysynthetic low resource language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such avenue of future work would be to broaden our analysis to more languages and include languages that are higher-resourced but morphologically rich and as well as ones that are lower-resourced but morphologically poor. Ortega et al (2021), which we encountered during preparation of the final version of this paper, began to address these questions by comparing Morfessor with BPE and their own BPE variant on Finnish, Quechua and Spanish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such avenue of future work would be to broaden our analysis to more languages and include languages that are higher-resourced but morphologically rich and as well as ones that are lower-resourced but morphologically poor. Ortega et al (2021), which we encountered during preparation of the final version of this paper, began to address these questions by comparing Morfessor with BPE and their own BPE variant on Finnish, Quechua and Spanish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the development of (MT) systems for indigenous languages in both South and North America, faces different challenges such as a high morphological richness, agglutination, polysynthesis, and orthographic variation (Mager et al, 2018b;Llitjós et al, 2005). In general, MT systems for these languages in the state-of-theart have been addressed by the sub-fields of machine translation: rule-based (Monson et al, 2006), statistical (Mager Hois et al, 2016) and neuralbased approaches (Ortega et al, 2020;Le and Sadat, 2020). Recently, NMT approaches (Stahlberg, 2020) have gained prominence; they commonly are based on sequence-to-sequence models using encoder-decoder architectures and attention mechanisms (Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, NMT approaches (Stahlberg, 2020) have gained prominence; they commonly are based on sequence-to-sequence models using encoder-decoder architectures and attention mechanisms (Yang et al, 2020). From this perspective, different morphological segmentation techniques have been explored (Kann et al, 2018;Ortega et al, 2020) for Indigenous American languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with the issue of complex morphology, Ortega et al (2020) build a translation model for Qeuchua, an Indigenous language of South America, with an integrated morphological segmentation method. To treat orthographic variation, Feldman and Coto-Solano (2020) standardize text with a rule-based system which converts diacritics and letters to contemporary orthographic convention.…”
Section: Mt Of Indigenous Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%