1999 Third International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH84
DOI: 10.1109/kes.1999.820201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural model of visual selective attention for automatic translation invariant object recognition in cluttered images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that Lozo's neural network can recognise familiar objects in the presence of noise 15 , however it is unable to recognise familiar images that are incomplete. Chong 16 further extends this work by proposing that in addition to top-down feedback from higher neural layers there should be a bottom-up feed-forward pathway for modulating topdown patterns. Chong 16 has shown that such an extended ART neural network is capable of recognising both partially occluded and incomplete objects in complex scenes.…”
Section: The Biological Linkmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown that Lozo's neural network can recognise familiar objects in the presence of noise 15 , however it is unable to recognise familiar images that are incomplete. Chong 16 further extends this work by proposing that in addition to top-down feedback from higher neural layers there should be a bottom-up feed-forward pathway for modulating topdown patterns. Chong 16 has shown that such an extended ART neural network is capable of recognising both partially occluded and incomplete objects in complex scenes.…”
Section: The Biological Linkmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This includes the continuing work by Carpenter and Grossberg in the ART 11 , ART2 12 , ART3 13 and ARTmap neural networks. Of interest are the works by Lozo 14,15 and Chong 16 .…”
Section: The Biological Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, studies in biological neural networks have suggested that one possible function is to provide memory feedback modulation (MFM) of the bottom-up input pattern to achieve object-background separation. Inspired from these findings, the first attempt to model this functionality was the selective attention adaptive resonance theory (SAART) neural network in 1995 [28,29] and its derivatives: distortion invariant SAART in 1999 [41,42] and complementary SAART in 2001 [40,48]. The SAART neural network incorporates a mechanism for top-down memory selective attention, which is achieved via pre-synaptic amplification of the bottom-up input features by the features that are active in the shortterm memory of the neural network.…”
Section: Proposed Vision Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAART neural network and its extensions (DISAART and CSAART) have been demonstrated through numerous computer simulations by Lozo [28,[45][46][47], Chong [40,48,49] and Westmacott [41,42], illustrating that these networks are capable of recognising 2D shapes, when they are presented in cluttered backgrounds and under varying image distortions. However, these networks were not designed to handle large variations in the input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the object), and (ii) subconscious execution of the program. Building on Henry James, Neisser formulated the current view of sensory "selective attention" such as auditory attention, visual attention, etc [11]. In this view, part of sensory processing is "preattentive" in that it is fast, parallel (all stimulus items simultaneously), inflexible (unchanged by behavioral goals), and involuntary (reflex-like), whereas another part is "attentive-serial" in that it is slow, serial (one stimulus item at a time), flexible (changed by behavioral goals), and voluntary.…”
Section: Biology Of Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%