Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association For Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/p17-1146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Modeling of Multi-Predicate Interactions for Japanese Predicate Argument Structure Analysis

Abstract: The performance of Japanese predicate argument structure (PAS) analysis has improved in recent years thanks to the joint modeling of interactions between multiple predicates. However, this approach relies heavily on syntactic information predicted by parsers, and suffers from error propagation. To remedy this problem, we introduce a model that uses grid-type recurrent neural networks. The proposed model automatically induces features sensitive to multi-predicate interactions from the word sequence information … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
43
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicate Argument Structure Analysis The first set of rows in Table 2 shows the results of previous models. Ouchi+ 17 is the model from the Multi-Seq model in (Ouchi et al, 2017). M&I 17 is the model in (Matsubayashi and Inui, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Predicate Argument Structure Analysis The first set of rows in Table 2 shows the results of previous models. Ouchi+ 17 is the model from the Multi-Seq model in (Ouchi et al, 2017). M&I 17 is the model in (Matsubayashi and Inui, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iida et al (2006), Imamura et al (2009), and Sasano and Kurohashi (2011) also analyze Inter-zero, which is a difficult task because the whole document must be searched. Following existing research (Ouchi et al, 2015(Ouchi et al, , 2017Inui, 2017, 2018;Taira et al, 2008), we only focus on three categories where arguments and their predicate (event-noun) are in the same sentence. In addition, we exclude the Bunsetsu category from the PASA evaluation following Ouchi et al (2017) and Matsubayashi and Inui (2018).…”
Section: Task Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The annotated corpora consist of several tens of thousands sentences, and it is difficult to learn predicate-argument relations or selectional preferences from such small-scale corpora. The state-of-the-art models for Japanese PAS analysis achieve an accuracy of around 50% for zero pronouns (Ouchi et al, 2015;Shibata et al, 2016;Iida et al, 2016;Ouchi et al, 2017;Matsubayashi and Inui, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%