2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural net modeling of estuarine indicators: Hindcasting phytoplankton biomass and net ecosystem production in the Neuse (North Carolina) and Trout (Florida) Rivers, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured:modeled correspondences for regression models were less than that for comparable ANNs, indicating that networks outperformed linear models (data not shown). This greater performance was anticipated; in theory, an ANN encompasses linear regression and because of a model architecture suited for identifying the nonlinear complexities of a biotic response to environmental forcing, should perform as well or better than regression models (Gonzalez 2000;Millie et al 2006bMillie et al , 2012. However, multicollinearity existed among the independent variables, and the predictor-response surfaces and biplots arising from the ANNs depicted interacting, nonlinear predictor influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measured:modeled correspondences for regression models were less than that for comparable ANNs, indicating that networks outperformed linear models (data not shown). This greater performance was anticipated; in theory, an ANN encompasses linear regression and because of a model architecture suited for identifying the nonlinear complexities of a biotic response to environmental forcing, should perform as well or better than regression models (Gonzalez 2000;Millie et al 2006bMillie et al , 2012. However, multicollinearity existed among the independent variables, and the predictor-response surfaces and biplots arising from the ANNs depicted interacting, nonlinear predictor influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Predictive performances for test data were slightly less; modeled values generally underestimated concentrations greater than 45 g CHL a·L −1 and over-or underestimated biovolumes less than 10 8 m 3 ·L −1 , whereas the correct assignment for instances in which biovolumes were absent declined substantially. These decreases in prediction performances likely arose from inadequate data representation within training subsets, thereby precluding optimal model development (e.g., Millie et al 2006b). Instances of <ϳ45 g CHL a·L −1 and >10 8 m 3 Microcystis·L -1 were 4.3-and 1.7-fold greater, respectively, in the database than instances of greater and lesser concentrations or biovolumes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantages of ANNs include (i) being computationally intensive, (ii) parameters must be determined with few guidelines, (iii) no standard procedure to define architecture, (iv) no global method for determining when to stop training and prevent overtraining, (v) sensitivity to the composition of the training data set and initial network parameters and (vi) they can be used as "black boxes" requiring no understanding of processes or relationships that are occurring (Millie et al, 2006;Ozesmi et al, 2006). However, many of these disadvantages (Ozesmi et al, 2006) can be addressed by (i) understanding the relevance of the input variables, (ii) using techniques (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs are non-parametric models that reproduce correlated patterns between variables through repetitive data processing (i.e. learning) (Millie et al, 2006). ANNs have been applied within the disciplines of water engineering and ecological sciences for the varied purposes of classification of catchment characteristics, function approximation, optimisation of modelling parameters and prediction of environmental variables (Chen et al, 2008;Palani et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these models are more accepted by decision makers because they offer a transparency that ANNs do not provide. However, ANNs have historically outperformed their regressive counterparts in many forms of science and engineering including: physical [1], chemical [2], communication [3], financial [4], and ecological [5] systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%