2009
DOI: 10.3390/a2010019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Network Analysis and Evaluation of the Fetal Heart Rate

Abstract: Abstract:The aim of the present study is to obtain a highly objective automatic fetal heart rate (FHR) diagnosis. The neural network software was composed of three layers with the back propagation, to which 8 FHR data, including sinusoidal FHR, were input and the system was educated by the data of 20 cases with a known outcome. The output was the probability of a normal, intermediate, or pathologic outcome. The neural index studied prolonged monitoring. The neonatal states and the FHR score strongly correlated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of neural network diagnosis was confirmed by simultaneously obtained FHR score in new cases. The FHR score was significantly higher in the group with a probability of a pathological outcome, intermediate in the group with a probability of an intermediate outcome and significantly low in the group with a probability of a normal outcome [10,11].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of neural network diagnosis was confirmed by simultaneously obtained FHR score in new cases. The FHR score was significantly higher in the group with a probability of a pathological outcome, intermediate in the group with a probability of an intermediate outcome and significantly low in the group with a probability of a normal outcome [10,11].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Trained software was installed onto other computers and used for the diagnosis of new cases, where the eight FHR parameters in three succeeding 5-minutes periods were entered into the software, with the output results being the probability that an outcome would be normal, intermediate or pathological. The results were objective and easily understood without education because they were reported as a percentage [7,10,11].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Netwrok (Ann) Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, rule-based classifiers have been addressed in [8] and neural networks in [13]. In [14], three different techniques were exploited for feature selection (principal component analysis, group of adaptive models evolution, and neural networks) followed by direct correlation of welldiscriminating feature sets with FHR pathology.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of the neural network computer: The recognition results obtained by the neural network with teaching input after training for 10,000 times, all data carried the probabilities of 0.998 (or 99.8 %) to1.000 (or 100 %) ( Table 2). Therefore, this well-trained neural network can be used to recognize new patients not included in the teaching patterns that is to say "open recognition" [12].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%