8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-4880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network and response surface methodology for rocket engine component optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of response surface method is verified by Shyy et al [20], Papila and Shyy [21], Madsen et al [22], and Vaidyanathan et al [23] in their works of designing rocket engine injector, supersonic turbines, diffuser, and rocket engine component, respectively. Prescribed set of design points, so called training points, is selected by D-optimal design [2].…”
Section: Optimization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The efficiency of response surface method is verified by Shyy et al [20], Papila and Shyy [21], Madsen et al [22], and Vaidyanathan et al [23] in their works of designing rocket engine injector, supersonic turbines, diffuser, and rocket engine component, respectively. Prescribed set of design points, so called training points, is selected by D-optimal design [2].…”
Section: Optimization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Efficiency of the response surface based optimization was verified by Shyy et al [15], Papila and Shyy [16], Madsen et al [17], and Vaidyanathan et al [18] in their works of designing rocket engine injector, supersonic turbines, diffuser, and rocket engine component, respectively. Prescribed set of design points, so called training points, was selected by full-factorial design [8].…”
Section: Optimization Process Response Surface Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Since the RSA model coefficients vector b is an unbiased estimate of coefficients vector (1) , it is expected that the error in the prediction will be a function of coefficients in vector (2) , and this is indeed observed from Equation (12).…”
Section: Estimation Of Bias Error Boundsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Madsen et al [7], Papila et al [8,9], Shyy et al [10,11] and, Vaidyanathan et al [12,13] used RSAs as design evaluators for the optimization of propulsion components including a turbulent flow diffuser, supersonic turbine, swirl coaxial injector element and liquid rocket injector designs. Redhe et al [14,15] and Craig et al [16] used RSAs in design of vehicles for crashworthiness.…”
Section: T Goel Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%