2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtelec.2023.100027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network approach for ferroelectric hafnium oxide phase identification at the atomistic scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the strategy of natural learning rate reduction, it can be seen that the loss value of the VGG16 model basically remains stable after undergoing 60 epoch training with no significant increase in accuracy. And at the end of the training, it showed a greater loss state . The ResNet18 model showed faster learning efficiency at the beginning, with a constant loss value of 0.02 after 23 epoch training and a small loss at the end of training.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the strategy of natural learning rate reduction, it can be seen that the loss value of the VGG16 model basically remains stable after undergoing 60 epoch training with no significant increase in accuracy. And at the end of the training, it showed a greater loss state . The ResNet18 model showed faster learning efficiency at the beginning, with a constant loss value of 0.02 after 23 epoch training and a small loss at the end of training.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…And at the end of the training, it showed a greater loss state. 36 The ResNet18 model showed faster learning efficiency at the beginning, with a constant loss value of 0.02 after 23 epoch training and a small loss at the end of training. Figure 5c The study further evaluated the ResNet18 and VGG16 models through the test set and drew the confusion matrix, which is an important index to evaluate the performance of the classifier and is mainly used to compare the classification results with the actual measured values, as shown in Figures 5e and S45c.…”
Section: Machine Learning Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recent article by Cheng et al compares the classification networks commonly used in materials science, demonstrating that ResNet18 has a lower computational cost and better performance among other CNN architectures. [ 128 ] Most notably, ResNet18 was shown to work even better than the VT approach, which is the state-of-the-art network for the manipulation of natural images (images that a human being would observe in the real world). To date, we have found only a handful of papers in the area of NMs that use vision transformers for image recognition.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches In Nanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since STEM images are two-dimensional, they contain very subtle 3D structural information, which was meticulously analyzed. In addition, in a study involving polycrystalline Hf 0.5 Zr 0.5 O 2 , deep learning was used on 4D-STEM data [217] . This revealed that it was possible to distinguish between the centrosymmetric monoclinic P2 1 /c, tetragonal P4 2 /nmc phase, and the orthorhombic Pca2 1 phase with ferroelectric polarization in the TEM samples, disregarding factors such as thickness, tilt, and rotation.…”
Section: Figure 14mentioning
confidence: 99%