Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510)
DOI: 10.1109/imtc.2004.1351399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network based motor bearing fault detection

Abstract: Ab.vfrad ~ Bearing ,farrlt.s ore the higgesl single rnrrse of nrolor ,failr~rez The hwring d Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stack et al [15] examine single-point defects and generalized roughness. Schoen's model components are also analyzed by using parametric [20] and nonparametric [2], [9] spectral analysis, neural networks, and/or wavelet transform [10], [21].…”
Section: Bearing Fault Detection By Stator Current Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stack et al [15] examine single-point defects and generalized roughness. Schoen's model components are also analyzed by using parametric [20] and nonparametric [2], [9] spectral analysis, neural networks, and/or wavelet transform [10], [21].…”
Section: Bearing Fault Detection By Stator Current Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-domain [4], frequency-domain [5][6][7][8], enhanced frequency [9][10][11][12], and time-scale analysis [13][14][15][16] are four main areas where signal processing techniques are used in the feature extraction [17]. The extracted features are used to both train and operate Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) or other decision support systems (DSS) [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Extracting fixed features each time data is analyzed by DSS may require significant amount of computational effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in the application of [52], using an ordinary computer, when the performance of the 1D CNN was tested, a fault detection speed of 45-times faster than real-time speed was achieved. As another example, Figure 17 presents the average classification times of the 1D CNN and the 6 competing methods for the application of motor fault detection where the competing methods are from [75][76][77][78]. .…”
Section: Computational Complexity Analysis Of 1d-cnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%