2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2070(02)00058-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network forecasts of Canadian stock returns using accounting ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
77
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Hill et al (1994) noticed that ANNs are likely to work best for high frequency financial data and Balkin & Ord (2000) also stressed the importance of a long time series to ensure optimal results from training ANNs. Qi (2001) pointed out that ANNs are more likely to outperform other methods when the input data is kept as current as possible, using recursive modelling (see also Olson & Mossman, 2003).…”
Section: Neural Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill et al (1994) noticed that ANNs are likely to work best for high frequency financial data and Balkin & Ord (2000) also stressed the importance of a long time series to ensure optimal results from training ANNs. Qi (2001) pointed out that ANNs are more likely to outperform other methods when the input data is kept as current as possible, using recursive modelling (see also Olson & Mossman, 2003).…”
Section: Neural Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuan and Liu (1995) [18] used a feed-forward ANN model as is used in this study in forecasting financial time series data. Olson and Mossman (2003) [19] found that ANN networks performed better forecasts with Canadian stock returns than logistic and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. Lastly, Ghiassi, Saidane, and Zimbra(2005) [20] found that the ANN was more accurate in forecasting time series data than autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that BPN model is capable of excellent prediction. Olson and Mossman compared error back-propagation neural network method with Logit model and Ordinary Least Square methods [4]. The results show that the neural network model is more accurate and possesses lower error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%