2022
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10020252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Network Non-Singular Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Target Tracking of Underactuated Underwater Robots with Prescribed Performance

Abstract: This paper proposes a neural network-based nonsingular terminal sliding mode controller with prescribed performances for the target tracking problem of underactuated underwater robots. Firstly, the mathematical formulation of the target tracking problem is presented with an underactuated underwater robot model and the corresponding control objectives. Then, the target tracking errors from the line-of-sight guidance law are transformed using the prescribed performance technique to achieve good dynamic performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reference trajectories are q d1 = q d2 = q d3 = q d4 = q d5 = q d6 = 0.1sint. The parameters of the sliding mode control are α = 2, β = 0.4, λ = 1.5, The ALSSA-RBFTSM algorithm designed in this paper is compared with the global fast terminal sliding mode (GFTSM) algorithm proposed in the literature [34] and the RBF neural network fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode (RBF-FNTSM) algorithm proposed in the literature [35]. From Figure 2, it can be seen that the GFTSM algorithm has the smallest initial control torques, but it experiences the most serious control torque jitter.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference trajectories are q d1 = q d2 = q d3 = q d4 = q d5 = q d6 = 0.1sint. The parameters of the sliding mode control are α = 2, β = 0.4, λ = 1.5, The ALSSA-RBFTSM algorithm designed in this paper is compared with the global fast terminal sliding mode (GFTSM) algorithm proposed in the literature [34] and the RBF neural network fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode (RBF-FNTSM) algorithm proposed in the literature [35]. From Figure 2, it can be seen that the GFTSM algorithm has the smallest initial control torques, but it experiences the most serious control torque jitter.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metrics for evaluating this paper's algorithm as well as other tracking algorithms in this experiment include the average distance precision (DP) [39] and the average overlap precision (OP) [40]. Distance precision is the percentage of frames with center error below a certain threshold (usually 20) to the total number of video frames, which can effectively reflect the robustness of the algorithm.…”
Section: Targeted Tracking Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been used to solve the stability and tracking problems of rigid manipulators, high-order nonlinear systems, and robotic surgery [14][15][16] . It is used for controlling some practical systems such as manipulator robots [17] , perturbed nonlinear systems [18] , DC-DC buck converters [19] , Quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles [20] , underactuated underwater robots [21] , acute Leukemia therapy [22] . Recently control engineering methods have been used to increase biomedical applications such as drug delivery in cancerous tumors [23] , tumor treatment immunity [24] , cancer chemotherapy [25] , control the tumor growth [26] , and angiogenic inhibition therapy [27] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%