1998
DOI: 10.1109/59.736281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network with fuzzy set-based classification for short-term load forecasting

Abstract: Electric power utilities require forecast of system some drawbacks such as inaccurate prediction, difficulty in demand or electrical load for one to seven days ahead. This modeling processes, numerical instability, requirement of paper studies a short-term electric load forecasting technique large historical database, and demand of high human using a multi-layered feedforward Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and a fuzzy set-based classification algorithm. The Recently. the application of the artificial neural n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best record to our knowledge in short-term load forecasting presented a MAPE of the 1.53 % [17]. According to [8], simply the reduction of the 1% in the average forecast error may save hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.…”
Section: A Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best record to our knowledge in short-term load forecasting presented a MAPE of the 1.53 % [17]. According to [8], simply the reduction of the 1% in the average forecast error may save hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.…”
Section: A Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the AR model shows the best overall performance, with very acceptable marks, specially with normal data. The best record to our knowledge in short-term load forecasting presented a MAPE of the 1.53 % [37]. According to [1], simply the reduction of the 1% in the average forecast error may save hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our problem domain, non-residential buildings, this possibility is not plausible since an 1% error may be a deviation of some kW. Hence, [20] accomplished a 1,945% (two points above the AR model in dataset 2, only a 1,31% difference if we take just weekdays) using a neural network (as in the case of [37]), with all the problems aforementioned that NN present (for instance, [37] uses a fuzzy set-based classification algorithm to improve the classification ability of their NN). Still, Neural networks (also Bayesian networks) offer a worse trade-off between the difficulty of design, parametrisation, etc., and the performance, in comparison, for instance, with time series.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the solutions studied in the literature [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][55][56][57][58][59] present sometimes good prediction efficiency figures (normally their MAPEs are around 2%), they deal almost exclusively with big areas, and mainly entire countries, and they are never applied to smaller environments of the size of small cities or microgrids. Therefore, they do not give any evidence of how will they behave when applied to highly variable load curves.…”
Section: Geographical Area In Load Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of Kim et al [47], an ANN produces a provisional load forecast, then, a fuzzy expert system is used to modify the provisional load forecast on the basis of temperature data and day type (workday/holiday). Daneshdoost et al [48] classify data into 48 fuzzy subsets by temperature and humidity, then each subset is modeled by its own ANN. Senjyu et al [49] present a hybrid correction method where fuzzy logic, based on -similar days‖, corrects the neural network output to obtain next-day load forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%