2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2005)131:10(898)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Networks for Estimation of Scour Downstream of a Ski-Jump Bucket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schoklitsch (1932) with R 2 = 0:45 and RMSE=0.08 is accurate among the empirical formulas, as shown in this gure, and the poorest performance is related to Azar (1998); as seen, all the empirical formulas have no acceptable performances for practical purposes. The results of assessing the performance of empirical formula support those of the study conducted by Azmathullah et al [9] who stated that using the empirical formula for calculating the depth of scour has obvious errors compared to the measured data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schoklitsch (1932) with R 2 = 0:45 and RMSE=0.08 is accurate among the empirical formulas, as shown in this gure, and the poorest performance is related to Azar (1998); as seen, all the empirical formulas have no acceptable performances for practical purposes. The results of assessing the performance of empirical formula support those of the study conducted by Azmathullah et al [9] who stated that using the empirical formula for calculating the depth of scour has obvious errors compared to the measured data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The USBR conducted an extensive study on the scouring depth at downstream of ip bucket and proposed empirical formula for calculating the depth of scour [7,8]. Azmathullah et al [9] assessed the accuracy of USBR formula for calculating the depth of scour at downstream of spillway of Rana Pratap Sagar Dam which was constructed across the Chamba River, and found that calculating the scour depth using the USBR formula is equal to 30 m, whereas the measured data is equal to 24.7 m. In other words, using the USBR formula causes about 30 percent error for predicting the scour depth. After USBR, several empirical studies have been conducted on the scour depth of calculation at the downstream of ip bucket structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBF networks have not been used extensively in environmental studies except a few researchers such as Azmathullah et al (2005), Bateni et al (2007) and Tahershamsi et al (2012). A typical RBF network has a feedforward structure consists of an input layer, a hidden layer with a radial basis activation function, and a linear output layer.…”
Section: Overview Of Ffbp Grnn and Rbf Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to model scouring, a variety of soft computing schemes have been used in recent years, such as an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict scour below a ski-jump bucket spillway (Azmathullah, Deo, & Deolalikar, 2005) and culvert outlets (Azamathulla & Haque, 2012), classification and regression trees to estimate wave-induced scour around a circular pile (Ayoubloo, Etemad-Shahidi, & Mahjoobi, 2010), an M5 model tree to estimate scour downstream of a ski-jump bucket spillway (Goyal & Ojha, 2011), an adaptive network based on fuzzy systems to determine scour around an arch-shaped bed sill (Keshavarzi, Gazni, & Homayoon, 2012), linear genetic programming to predict scour around a circular pile (Guven, Azamathulla, & Zakaria, 2009), and the group method of data handling to predict scour downstream of a ski-jump bucket spillway (Najafzadeh, Barani, & Hessami Kermani, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%