Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/mesa.2010.5552027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural networks modeling of autonomous underwater vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors tested the proposed methodology using a simulation of an AUV and no real sensory data was considered. Another work that used a simulated AUV to generate training data was presented in [50]. The authors compared an MLP and a recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture, showing a slight improvement of the RNN performance over the MLP.…”
Section: Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors tested the proposed methodology using a simulation of an AUV and no real sensory data was considered. Another work that used a simulated AUV to generate training data was presented in [50]. The authors compared an MLP and a recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture, showing a slight improvement of the RNN performance over the MLP.…”
Section: Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some non-linear control technologies, including nonlinear intelligent technologies, such as the backstepping method [12], [13], fuzzy control [14], neural networks [15], [16], sliding mode control [17] and model predictive control [18], have been widely applied to the following control of UUV. However, these non-linear control methods are applied, and additional parameters and iterations are also required during the calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these controller methods have demonstrated acceptable results, these control methods still face difficulties in tuning the controller gains to maintain overall stability and high-quality response when the control performance degrades due to significant changes in the vehicle dynamics and its environment. The high nonlinearity and time-variance of underwater vehicle dynamics, and unpredictable underwater disturbances such as the fluctuating water currents are the main reasons that make the underwater vehicles such as the underwater glider difficult to control [14][15][16]. Thus, it is highly desirable to design a controller that has a self-tuning and an adaptive ability to deal with these constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%